Debating with my wife this morning. She believes that Trump was disappointed and that he didn’t have enough evidence to take them to court over it and overturn it. I completely disagree and tried to present my logic. Your thoughts as to how it transpired and logic to support that.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
I made some notes at the time and put them on this web site.
If you can think of a way to subvert an election they tried it. One of the best ones was Trump losing nearly 20,000 votes in Pennsylvania while Biden gained the same amount. That was broadcast on live TV! Nothing to see here, folks.
The judges were complicit as well. Some cases they threw out because they were too early. Similar cases were thrown out because they were too late! Some were rejected because of "lack of standing" that is, if you do not have a dog in the race you cannot bring a case. They even rejected some of Trump's cases on that basis. Did he have a direct interest in the outcome?
Rudy Giuliani says he had a table full of ring binders all containing signed affidavits which are basically witness testimony written under oath. No-one wanted to see any of them.