They have to go. Just compare data that shows positive impact versus negative. If irrefutable proof cannot be provided they are doing what they claim, then it's a no brainer. They have nothing to stand on.
However they can't just be let off the hook since we know they can't back up their claims. There has to be a flip side to that. If evidence can show a pattern of death or injury then they need to face justice.
They have to go. Just compare data that shows positive impact versus negative. If irrefutable proof cannot be provided they are doing what they claim, then it's a no brainer. They have nothing to stand on.
However they can't just be let off the hook since we know they can't back up their claims. There has to be a flip side to that. If evidence can show a pattern of death or injury then they need to face justice.
They have always known vaccines are harmful, so there needs to be justice.