A candidate now has defined standing in court. If they have proof of election fraud that may impact the slate of electors (R or D) selected and certified by the state in their certificate of ascertainment, they can initiate a fast-tracked federal case in the affected state. It is a 3 judge panel comprised of a district judge and 2 from the Appeals court. They have to hear the case immediately. And everyone involved has to move fast. If the judges rule against the state’s declaration of the winner, the certificate of ascertainment already at the Archives can be replaced at the court’s direction. This was not a path defined or allowed in 2020.
no longer does a candidate have to count on members of Congress or the VP to intervene.
The down side is that any action has to occur before 1/6. Although I believe the House /Senate can recess if there are issues?
I read it---can someone put that in english?
A candidate now has defined standing in court. If they have proof of election fraud that may impact the slate of electors (R or D) selected and certified by the state in their certificate of ascertainment, they can initiate a fast-tracked federal case in the affected state. It is a 3 judge panel comprised of a district judge and 2 from the Appeals court. They have to hear the case immediately. And everyone involved has to move fast. If the judges rule against the state’s declaration of the winner, the certificate of ascertainment already at the Archives can be replaced at the court’s direction. This was not a path defined or allowed in 2020.
no longer does a candidate have to count on members of Congress or the VP to intervene.
The down side is that any action has to occur before 1/6. Although I believe the House /Senate can recess if there are issues?