Welp, this story happened earlier today on Pensacola Beach.
Here are all the alarm bells going off in my head:
- Holly Shelton Snowden is a singer and a local celebrity in the Florida Panhandle. Her husband is also a well known and respected musician. She has convenient name recognition.
- This was her first time ever holding signs for a political cause
- And she is attacked, on her first time ever holding signs for a political cause.
- Gets a nice neat black eye from this encounter. No other bruising that I can see from the pics. I've seen Holly in person multiple times; she is TALL. I'm surprised she doesn't also have bruising on her cheek as well.
- Everything, including pics and info, is all just from the Harris/Walz side of this story.
- Obviously it's Sinclair news so it will be biased, but WEAR 3 and especially the long time anchors Sue and Bob don't even bother to hide their disgust of conservatives. For fun, watch them have to cover a story about our local firebrand Matt Gaetz.
Here is my take from this, just on precedent and snap judgment: President Trump has taken Florida and especially the NW part of the state by a massive landslide, and the news station has gotten their marching orders to create a story/narrative that Trump supporters are violent. I'm not saying coordination was involved, but I don't think WEAR 3 and the local chapter of the DNC needed an excuse to jump when told to.
If I'm wrong, I'm wrong and I'll own it. There, that's my disclaimer.
Yeah. The oval bruise matches the shape of her sunglasses lens. May have been bumped in the eye and the lens bopped her.
You are right. No other bruising or marks. Why wasn't it on video? They videoed everything else, right?
is sinclair broadcasting the liberal conspirator or is it the news director on that channel? didn't sinclair purposely do that experiment of all his news casters reading the same script, claiming it was a danger to democracy? that was pretty based thing to do in exposing the media nonsense imo.
Sinclair is the liberal conspirator. They own news stations all over the country. That video was a compilation of the directive that Sinclair gave their local networks to say so they could claim they weren't propaganda or fake news.
I thought sinclair had done it to prove they actually were fake news and that the media is easily controlled....
this from wikipedia:
I know it is wikipedia, but maybe read the page they have on sinclair broadcasting before looking further into it's positions.
I've been dealing with WEAR 3 for years because im from this area. I'm not throwing out lightly that they're liberal propaganda. If Sinclair had an issue, I feel like they would have stepped in and course corrected the station already.
ok, and fox news is on our side...
I get it...
That's not at all what I said. You are purposely misconstrued my words.
we both know that, but now think about WHY I would say that....