Nevada 6 and Arizona 11 now tell me that aint white hat comms
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
OK, but what about the first two states? What about all of the states that added up to something a confirmation bias wouldn't hit on?
"White hats" are in such minute control they can choose when states report and line it up in such a way that the sum of the electoral college votes of the last two add up (never subtract, divide, or multiply, mind you) to seventeen because "comm". Yet 325,000 children go missing, dead, or in slavery or sex slavery and they let it happen? As Q might say: Reconcile. Think Logically.
Im prefacing all this by saying this was just an offhand observation that lit up my brain for a moment, im not saying this is absolutely true though my conspiracy leaning mind likes to think so.
If you wanted to do this with the first two it would be difficult, youd have to basically race and rush those states. You dont leave a calling card at the beginning because itll get lost in the chaos.
Having complete control over election devices or atleast control over when those two specific states specifically with the Associated Press reporting is NOT even close to the same as having complete control over all sex trafficking rings.
Its either the leadership at the AP helped leave a subtle calling card or its a coincidence. I thought it was fun to think about so i posted about it.
Well that's fair enough. :-)