Thanks, but I always try to find sources from media, that normies accept. If I use ZH, they just say "right wing" and stop listening.
Besides, while the election 2020 looks very suspicious in the graph, the graph doesn't really say anything, without having the turnout percentages as well. If the turnout 2024 is the same or better than 2020, then something is clearly wrong with the 2020 election results. However, if the turnout is at least 20% less than that for 2020, then the 2020 voting results could be explained away.
I really do believe that 2020 was fraudulent, but I would like some hard facts, that nobody can explain away by claiming political bias.
This explains it much better:
"Meanwhile, we can't reiterate this enough - we have questions"
https://x.com/zerohedge/status/1854144250562429081
Thanks, but I always try to find sources from media, that normies accept. If I use ZH, they just say "right wing" and stop listening.
Besides, while the election 2020 looks very suspicious in the graph, the graph doesn't really say anything, without having the turnout percentages as well. If the turnout 2024 is the same or better than 2020, then something is clearly wrong with the 2020 election results. However, if the turnout is at least 20% less than that for 2020, then the 2020 voting results could be explained away.
I really do believe that 2020 was fraudulent, but I would like some hard facts, that nobody can explain away by claiming political bias.