This is not a research post. It's an 'opinion piece'.
I'm noticing a few posts that rag on Pompeo, with an assortment of anons (most who I do not recognize, but some who I do) jumping on the bandwagon and ragging on Pompeo, with all sorts of what seems to me to be narrative deployments against Pompeo that have an ambiguous or dodgy basis in actual fact.
In other words, (it seems to me, even though I might be wrong, of course) these are lots of conclusions drawn from narratives and headlines, without any serious research into the specific matters.
It appears to me that the DS intel apparatus (via media, etc) has made a very concerted attempt to smear Pompeo and destroy his reputation with MAGA, much in the same way that people like Michael Flynn have been attacked by obvious disinfo operatives and fake maga.
Pompeo's vulnerability to such is perhaps greater than Flynn's, because he actually served Donald J. Trump in his administration for four years, in some very key areas. So there is a lot of fodder for the DS propaganda and intel machine to spin narratives around him and seed these to MAGA and those either in or adjacent to the Great Awakening.
Given the right push, some of these narratives take on a life of their own.
Somehow, even though the breakthrough Abraham Accords were accomplished through and with Pompeo by Trump (incl. Kushner), Pompeo is a warmonger.
Somehow, even though DS anti-Trump Marxist journalists created the story (based on anonymous sources) that Pompeo orchestrated a plot to kidnap or even murder Assange, the story is seen as true.
Somehow, even though Trump saw fit to work with and rely on Pompeo for the entire four years of his administration, Pompeo is evil.
He also said things that hurt people's feelings in the same way that Trump hurt leftist's feelings. e.g. "If Trump is guilty of improperly holding classified documents, then he should be charged". (Bastard, right?)
It makes sense for different people to have different opinions re: Pompeo. But we are in the midst of a 5G war. Narrative war. Psychological war. There are serious forces attempting to manipulate us. Both sides do this, even if it is for completely different reasons.
It might be my own personal bias, but in these posts, I see people not thinking with critical reasoning, people reacting from charged emotions based on narratives that have been sown out there, which trigger reactive emotional responses that make the task of sorting fact from fiction harder than it should be. Or could be.
These frens hate and despise Pompeo, but do they ever ask "Have I been manipulated to hate Pompeo"? Some people think that they trust Donald Trump, but somehow, when it comes to Pompeo, Trump must be an idiot. Or ignorant.
One thing worth thinking about. If DJT 'caught them all' and still put Pompeo in to the CIA, well, that's like putting someone into the most dangerous, most cesspoolish environment possible. The C_A don't f*ck around. They are far worse than the Mafia. As an organization, the evil elements in the C_A kill people and are responsible for what are probably the very worst crimes perpetrated by USA actors over the past century.
To survive in that environment, you'd have to be as hard as nails. Harder. much, much harder. So regardless of what people think of Pompeo, they shoudl recognize that good or bad, he's NOT going to be just some run-of-the-mill schmuck dude. He's not going to behave like a politician, and he's not going to behave like an influencer. I think that's worth thinking about or examining whenever examining what Pompeo has said.
Note: I do not mean to be disparaging of other frogs who have different opinion re: Pompeo. I am simply attempting to make a case for why I think their conclusions or beliefs are different to mine. But its also true that sometimes those different opinions are based on facts or information I do not know.
Anyway, we'll see if Pompeo is brought in to DJT administration #2. If he is, then some people (frogs), I think, are going to have to confront some serious cognitive dissonance.
I mean, cognitive dissonance isn't something that only afflicts the leftists or those with TDS. It happens whenever someone has been manipulated (without their awareness, by actors or events, or by ones own self) into believing something that simply isn't based in reality or truth, and when they are then confronted with the reality or truth that contradicts a deeply held but erroneous belief.
If you are human, then you are potentially subject to that. We all are.
I have my own view and opinion about Pompeo. I think that DJT trusts him, that DJT trusted him enough to put him in some very difficult positions, including to lay the groundwork for the neutralization of the CIA to the extent necessary for the first phase of the Trump Plan (i.e. 3 stage plan). I also think that there has been a set of concerted efforts to undermine Pompeo in the minds of Trump supporters. I also think that like a number of collaborators with Trump, Pompeo engaged is some form of kayfebe or role play during the second phase of the Trump Plan (aka the "joe Biden" administration period of 4 years).
That view is significantly influenced (informed?) by how I understand the Q operation and also by Trump's actions, but I also try to inform those views with facts, via research, digging, and reflective analysis. I might be wrong in my conclusions, but I try to include data and research to backup my opinions or views, and to inform them as much as feels necessary.
Normally, in this sort of situation, I would write a research post enumerating the various claims against Pompeo, posting what facts and information I could dig on them, to offer some airing of the narratives and how well they gel with facts, and them discuss my (or possible) interpretations based on that data and factual information.
I might do that in coming days. I'm hesitant, because when I write such posts, many hours of research and digging and writing go in to them, and that takes a lot of energy. Anyway, for now, I'll just share my opinion piece.
Perhaps it will provide an opportunity for some interesting discussion!
Note: I made a start on one such post, that deals with the origins of the "Pompeo tried to kidnap and assassinate Assange" narrative here. I still think its worth reading as a starting point to getting to some of the facts around this particular anti-Pompeo narrative.
Now, let the flamming and the downvoting begin!
God bless America.
According to 3 deep state 'journalists' who promoted the russia hoax.
Facts matter.
Why do you allow yourself to get so caught up in narratives? This is not Q's approach, friend.
Because it's a fact that Pompeo wanted to murder Julian Assange when he was head of the CIA. It's a fact Pompeo was the one that talked the President out of releasing a bunch of classified material. Tucker Carlson verified it. He's never been a Russia hoax deep state guy. I would say that's exactly Q's approach, friend. Call out the deep state swamp monsters for exactly what they are.
Did you think that Tucker came up with this story? You are completely wrong. That's a fact. Tucker simply has adopted their story as if fact. It's by no means a proven fact.
This is the actual sauce. Maybe you wanna research on these guys, and also consider their 'evidence'. I have.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kidnapping-assassination-and-a-london-shoot-out-inside-the-ci-as-secret-war-plans-against-wiki-leaks-090057786.html
When this story was published, it was taken up by ALL the key globalist mouthpieces: The Guardian, The Nation, Democracy Now, Rolling Stone, etc.
I haven't found any actual evidence provided by others, including Tucker. All I've seen is amplification of their narrative story, including Tucker, who I like a lot but I do not think he is perfect.
What you think is fact is only because you have heard the story from a bunch of people who's word you take for it instead of researching the actual facts.
If you can come back at me with a parallel level of research, then I can begin to take your claims seriously. But just repeating things you've heard and asserting them does not make them either true, or evidence based.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17tLFhJg2S/pompeo-assange-and-the-evil-pomp/
If Donald Trump, or Kash Patel, or Flynn, or Scavino come out and accused Pompeo of being a rat, then I'd take the assertion seriously. And I'd count that as significant evidence.
(DJT saying Pompeo dissuaded him from releasing ALL the JFK material doesn't qualify, because we have no way of knowing of NOT releasing all the information during 2016-2020 would have been a good thing or not. Now, with RFK in play, it's much more time appropriate and will potentially be a LOT more powerful. Because the mandate DJT has to tiotally clean house in the CIA and FBI is NOW at its height. It wasn't there before.)
The Cabal media running and promoting a narrative based on anonymous "former officials" I don't consider significant evidence. In fact, often a negative marker. Since when did the Cabal start dealing in truth and 'outing' their own DS operatives? When?
Its the same thing with the JFK files. Why didn't Trump do all that in his first term? Timing really matters. I don't know about you, but I firmly believe that there is a lot of substance to Patel Patriot's devolution research, and I certainly see the Trump plan as stage 1 (Admin #1) + stage 2 (Biden Admin) + stage 3 (now, Admin #2).
And to me, NOT releasing all the info on JFK in stage 1 fits with that. Now, Trump has a massive, publicly recognized mandate. (He had the mandate before, but too many of the American public have been asleep).
Perhaps I'm incorrect about Pompeo, but I'm confident I've done a lot more research on him than a lot of others. I also know that the DS and Cabal are running attack disinfo operations against us, the Q movement and the anons. Or do you think they just leave us all alone? They know exactly how dangerous the Q movement is to them.
I'll continue to look at the data and evidence. But I wonder what you will do if Trump actually decides to employ Pompeo again. How will you deal with the cognitive dissonance? Abandon Trump? Say he's an idiot? Gone off track?
Thinking that you absoilutely know what is going on and who people are in this psycological war we are in is a very weak position, in my view.
I don't KNOW if Pompeo is a good guy or not. But I've formulated my opinion based on research and evidence, not to mention the very attacks that have been launched against him. (A lot of weak attacks, that appeal to emotional reaction, instead of objectively considering potential different explanations. For example, Jack Poso.)
Time will tell. Perhaps.
Pompeo himself went on to Fake News and took Jack Smith's side against President Trump. He said Trump broke the law when he "stole classified" documents. You know what this sounds like? The same deep state propaganda that pushed a false narrative that General Flynn was a bad guy. They are now defending Pompeo. I stand by what I said. Pompeo can go FUCK himself.
You REALLY do not like facts, do you?
He said all of that Premised by "If the allegations are true". He never said that DJT broke the law. He said that IF he broke the law, then blah, blah, blah.
Have your opinion. I prefer to at least pay attention to the details.