No To Pompeo
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
The Q drops make it 100% explicit that Q is referring to Pompeo as Kansas.
So either this was disinformation (Pompeo was in fact dirty) or Q wanted us to actually trust Pompeo, indicating he is not actually dirty.
But some folks are gonna believe what they want to believe. Facts don't really count.
I'll be curious to see where this all goes.
This is SO curious. Has there even been such a massive campaign against someone? I mean, besides Trump?
I guess people elected Trump the President, but they feel then that he cannot make good decisions unless they tell him that they know better.
Jeepers. It's astonishing. Talk about piling on. THe problem is, the evidence is so tainted. People putting their own interpretations on to things and treating them like fact. Hmmmm...
Yes, very curious. Great insights!