In my opinion there is a line. Kind of difficult and easy to understand.

If a Church has a mission statement that proclaims they will do what the government tells them to do, that causes a conflict. The best example is of late with mask mandates and vaccine hysteria.

The Church and all USA Church’s had to make a decision. Those who opposed the government were being attacked behind the scenes and those who kneeled were allowed to flourish.

So the people of the church were deceived by the Church and those within the Church had that seen this had to make a decision to follow the leadership kneeling to the government or stand up.

I have two brothers on different spectrums of this situation. The one brother who goes to Church all of a sudden wants me to listen to his Pastor and such. Yet if I go to his churches social Media page I can find they all wore masks.

Why would I go to a church who would have kicked me out of the church for not wearing a mask? Then the proclaiming that the mRNA is from God?

This church is only one example of the thousands of Churches across the USA that did the exact same thing.

So if I say lukewarm it is more inline with leadership and not the church goers.

To add many churches fly the lgbtq commie flag now.

The Church has become lukewarm and needs to Leadership. I suspect many Churches will be out of business because of this thing they did. I am not perfect nor am I judging anyone or any church. It is not my fault they did what they did. They should not try and make their last few years disappear, they should own it and such…

The thing is. IF A CHURCH persuaded people to get the mRNA under the disguise of following orders.. could they be liable for the damage they caused by following orders?