Well, perhaps they are not half wrong. History will tell. it is very clear that Q was a psyop. But it was a powerful, truth motivated psyop, to wake up millions and trigger a change in awareness in the wider population.
I think it is possible that many of the things that some people expect as a result of Q might not happen in the way they expect.
I would say that Q is about waking up. Learning about the reality of the world we live in, and learning to realize that we've been programmed and learning to unprogram ourselves. That also means, not adhering to our own interpretation of Q. Also, to distinguish between Q and anons. Adrenochrome? That's not Q. That's anon. (there may well be verious levels of truth to different aspects of the anon theories around adrenochrome, but will we ever know? I don't know.
The reports of police officer reactions to the Weiner laptop are the most intense. But whether this level of underbelly will be fully exposed, I do not know.
So I think it is OK to termper one's interpretations and expectations around Q, and to adopt a stance of rational reasonableness. There are somethings about Q we can be certain of: it's tremendous impact on awakening, and the triggering of exposure of many things we never really knew about. If you emphasize this aspect, perhaps you sister and husband can recognize that Q is real.
In other words, make a mental distinction between:
Things we know for sure about Q: it's impact, the proofs, the benefits of the approaches Q encouraged
Things we do not know for sure about Q: how much was disinformation, how much was actual information, what the full purpose of the Q operation was, how it will all play out, etc.
Being clear and frank about what we do know and what we do not know, by drawing a distinction between what we know, what we believe and conjecture, we are not being disloyal to Q. Quite the opposite. That's being very Q ish.
The corrupt cabal utilized massive psyops and media-based brainwashing for many decades to lead populations into a state of trance and delusion, while robbing and murdering us all the while, but the Q operation was a psyop to snap us out of this trance, liberate our capacity to think properly, freely, for ourselves, while inspiring us to dig and find the truth about things.
For me, this is the essence of Q, and all the other stuff is simply part of the methodology. From Big Mike to Face Masks, to Gunatanamo trials, to JFK jr, etc, there is a LOT of stuff in the Awakening sphere that did NOT directly come from Q. To me, all that stuff is expendable. I can believe or not believe, without any major impact on the benefits of the Q operation. (personally, I think that actually a lot of the belief aspects are detrimental because they go against the kind of mental freedom that Q was attempting to instil. But that's me....)
Well, perhaps they are not half wrong. History will tell. it is very clear that Q was a psyop. But it was a powerful, truth motivated psyop, to wake up millions and trigger a change in awareness in the wider population. I think it is possible that many of the things that some people expect as a result of Q might not happen in the way they expect. I would say that Q is about waking up. Learning about the reality of the world we live in, and learning to realize that we've been programmed and learning to unprogram ourselves. That also means, not adhering to our own interpretation of Q. Also, to distinguish between Q and anons. Adrenochrome? That's not Q. That's anon. (there may well be verious levels of truth to different aspects of the anon theories around adrenochrome, but will we ever know? I don't know.
The reports of police officer reactions to the Weiner laptop are the most intense. But whether this level of underbelly will be fully exposed, I do not know.
So I think it is OK to termper one's interpretations and expectations around Q, and to adopt a stance of rational reasonableness. There are somethings about Q we can be certain of: it's tremendous impact on awakening, and the triggering of exposure of many things we never really knew about. If you emphasize this aspect, perhaps you sister and husband can recognize that Q is real.
In other words, make a mental distinction between:
Things we know for sure about Q: it's impact, the proofs, the benefits of the approaches Q encouraged
Things we do not know for sure about Q: how much was disinformation, how much was actual information, what the full purpose of the Q operation was, how it will all play out, etc.
Being clear and frank about what we do know and what we do not know, by drawing a distinction between what we know, what we believe and conjecture, we are not being disloyal to Q. Quite the opposite. That's being very Q ish.
The corrupt cabal utilized massive psyops and media-based brainwashing for many decades to lead populations into a state of trance and delusion, while robbing and murdering us all the while, but the Q operation was a psyop to snap us out of this trance, liberate our capacity to think properly, freely, for ourselves, while inspiring us to dig and find the truth about things.
For me, this is the essence of Q, and all the other stuff is simply part of the methodology. From Big Mike to Face Masks, to Gunatanamo trials, to JFK jr, etc, there is a LOT of stuff in the Awakening sphere that did NOT directly come from Q. To me, all that stuff is expendable. I can believe or not believe, without any major impact on the benefits of the Q operation. (personally, I think that actually a lot of the belief aspects are detrimental because they go against the kind of mental freedom that Q was attempting to instil. But that's me....)