BRUNSON DECISION: We've Known This For Quite a While. Sun. 10 Nov. 2024: Loy Brunson has signed an NDA. A verdict has been reached, which shows SCOTUS Thomas indicated was "in his favor." The Military has not released the verdict of the Supreme Court yet to prevent CIVIL UNREST It really did - The Great Awakening

BRUNSON DECISION: We've Known This For Quite a While. Sun. 10 Nov. 2024: Loy Brunson has signed an NDA. A verdict has been reached, which shows SCOTUS Thomas indicated was "in his favor." The Military has not released the verdict of the Supreme Court yet to prevent CIVIL UNREST It really did (twitter.com)

posted 2 days ago by Joys1Daughter 2 days ago by Joys1Daughter +153 / -1

79 comments

79 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (79)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– Monomial 4 points 2 days ago +4 / -0

BTW, on the other thread I asked for more information about this case. I have since found the actual case under consideration that he is requesting to be re-examined under rule 11:

*https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-1028/264270/20230425133210857_20230425-132551-00002580-00000251.pdf * It is basically names every Congressman and Senator who certified the fraudulent 2020 election without properly considering the claims of fraud as they were Constitutionally required to do, plus Harris and Biden.

Would love to see all of them deposed under oath.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Joys1Daughter [S] 1 point 2 days ago +1 / -0

Wow...thank YOU Monomial! Well done! 👏

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q