Germany’s Scholz Bows to Pressure, Calls Confidence Vote for December 16 – Early Elections in February – MSM Crowns CDU’S Merz N...
Olaf Scholz, the most unpopular German Chancellor in recorded history, has lost the battle to extend his ailing minority government for another few months.
I have a friend who is AfD and he confirmed snap elections upcoming. Praying the conservatives can gain ground and contend for majority!
Thank you for sharing this. Will be joining you in prayers.
The scramble for new elections is a smear theater November 14, 2024 By Peter Haisenko
It is an undignified haggling over the date for the new elections. Sometimes it's about pension entitlements and then about which laws can still be pushed through. The entire process does not correspond to what the Basic Law *(GG=Grundgesetz) *provides for. Under no circumstances is it about what would be good and necessary for Germany.
The date originally set by Chancellor Scholz for the new elections was set in such a way that all members of the Bundestag would have received exactly one extra day, which would have given them full credit for the fourth year and thus €280 more per month in pension entitlements. This is now off the table, but it is not fixed. It has been agreed that the Chancellor will request a vote of confidence on December 11 and the Bundestag will then vote on it on December 16. The new election is to take place on February 23. So far so bad. But what would happen if Scholz did not ask for a vote of confidence? Because he doesn't have to. Or forgets that he wanted to do it. It can be taken for granted that he no longer has the trust of the government.
So why doesn't Scholz ask the question of confidence immediately? Or why doesn't Merz initiate a constructive vote of no confidence? Also immediately. Or the ousted Lindner? Why should the country have to deal with this unworthy state of affairs for an unnecessarily long time? Why is the Federal President taking part in this theater? Is this supposed to promote trust in “our democracy”? Or is it the case that Merz is also interested in seeing some red-green laws passed that he also wants, but for which he then does not have to take responsibility? Laws that a majority of voters do not want. It is a smear theater! It is a mockery of “our democracy” or, better, of democracy as such.
A professor speaks plainly Ulrich Vosgerau is a renowned professor of constitutional law. However, he has made himself unpopular with Merkel & Co, the left-wing Greens, and so his entry on Wikipedia is also rather disrespectful. He has spoken out critically on various topics, sensitive topics. For example, on migration policy and the breaches of the constitution in connection with the handling of coronavirus policy. Vosgerau has now come forward with an assessment of the re-election process. Let's take a look at what he has to say: Ulrich Vosgerau on X: https://x.com/UlrichVosgerau/status/1856296625494171940 (Vosgerau has emphasized the following on X) The news comes that “the SPD and CDU/CSU parliamentary groups” have “agreed on a date for the next federal election”, namely February 23. This is - against the background of current constitutional law - a grotesque process. First of all, the Federal Chancellor would have to ask for a vote of confidence on his own initiative. If he does not receive the vote of confidence, he can either resign - or propose to the Federal President that the Bundestag be dissolved (Art. 68 para. 1 GG).
However, the Federal President does not have to do this! (Difference e.g. to the “proposal” of the Federal Chancellor to dismiss a certain minister, Art. 64 para. 1 GG: the Federal President must follow this!) In fact, the Federal President then has 21 days to consider whether he wants to dissolve the Bundestag. The Federal President could also decide not to dissolve the Bundestag, in which case the Chancellor would have to continue in office with a minority government. Or resign, in which case the BP could either ask the Chancellor himself or, if he absolutely does not want to, one of the federal ministers to continue in office (Art. 69 para. 3 GG).
The fact that now - which is just as little provided for in the Basic Law as the “epidemic cabinet” at the time! - two parliamentary groups have now “agreed” on the de facto self-dissolution of the Bundestag (which does not exist in the Basic Law!) and new elections, and the Federal President is apparently playing along, all in complete contradiction to constitutional law, shows that constitutional law is apparently in a state of dissolution.
And if the AfD doesn't play along? As far as Vosgerau is concerned. But what if the AfD does not play along and expresses its confidence in Scholz? If they don't want to let Scholz out of his mess? Yes, it is to be expected that the AfD's votes will be enough to overturn the vote of confidence. The AfD could then drive Merz in front of him and force him to hold a constructive vote of no confidence after all. Then it would once again be the AfD that would demand behavior in accordance with the rules of the Basic Law. Is it the fear of this possibility that has led to the motion for an AfD ban being tabled for a vote in the Bundestag right now? Or is it the fear that the AfD could perform so strongly in new elections that conditions like those in Saxony would arise? Oh yes, in “our democracy” anything that goes against the AfD is allowed. It can be taken for granted that this ban proposal will not be passed. So, once again, it's just a matter of using any means necessary to steal a few more votes away from the AfD. Just like the constant talk of “guaranteed right-wing extremism”. Interior Minister Faeser has now removed the President of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Haldenwang, from office on the grounds that he is running for a seat in the Bundestag for the CDU. Not that we should shed a tear for Haldenwang, but this process is also borderline. It is in line with the general left-green stance: Anyone who is not for us is an enemy of “our democracy” and our enemy. I can only quote Vosgerau, who says that constitutional law is obviously in a state of dissolution.
Is the dissolution of the FRG expected? I can't help but get the impression that people in Berlin are acting as if they are in a doomsday scenario. That nothing matters anyway. That the destruction of the German economy, indeed of the FRG, is already complete and that it doesn't matter whether laws and customs are still adhered to. Right now, Trump's historic election victory has put the finishing touches to these hasardes. Like a bunch of chickens, they no longer know what to do or where to go. Or do they expect Russia to actually annul the 2+4 treaty? They have given enough reason, Merz in particular. And then it won't matter anyway. Then there will have to be a complete restart. Then the FRG will no longer exist in this form. All laws and treaties that the FRG has concluded since 1990 will then be null and void. All of them, because the legal basis no longer exists. Eureka! Then we will have 20,000 fewer building regulations in one fell swoop. We can build again. Then we'll be free of all dictates from Brussels again and can happily drive our diesels. By the way, is there an easier way to reduce bureaucracy? All the bureaucratic monsters that have been created since 1990 would no longer exist. And yes, we would have to survive a period of chaos.
An empire in decline.... When I look at how our chiefs deal with the Basic Law, I suspect that they know more and are already firmly expecting the 2+4 Treaty to be annulled. That none of them will still have any responsibility in a few months' time. That Germany's status will finally be regulated anew with peace treaties. That Germany will become a sovereign state. With a constitution on which the people have voted in accordance with international law - something we were promised back in 1990 and which has not yet been possible because the USA has banned referendums at federal level.
The world is currently experiencing a period of upheaval that is unprecedented in history. Further developments could be just as unprecedented and it is hard to imagine what could be possible. The handling of the Basic Law confirms what the ancient Romans already knew: an empire, a state in decline, does everything it can to accelerate it. The cucumber squad in Berlin is working on this with full force.
DeepL-Translation of https://www.anderweltonline.com/klartext/klartext-20242/das-gerangel-um-die-neuwahlen-ist-ein-schmierentheater/
I really appreciate you sharing this information with us. Also for the links. Praying that Germany will be free again along with all Nations.
I see the trigger for the collapse of the coalition at this point in time in connection with President Trump's victory. A major clean-up is beginning in the USA and the foundations for this are currently being laid in Western European countries. It is NOT happening by chance!
Unfortunately, Americans do not understand German “democracy”. We do not have a majority vote. The corrupt parties determine at least 50% of the representatives in our parliaments via the so-called “list procedure”. If one party, like the CSU, wins all direct mandates, then the other parties get so-called “compensatory mandates”. The number of MPs in our parliaments is not fixed. So-called “Überhangmandate” can occur. For this reason, we, some 82 Mio people currently have the second largest parliament in the world (733) after China (~2,980) and ahead of North Korea (687). Parties that do not receive more than 5% of the votes cast are only represented in parliament if one of their members wins their constituency.
The upcoming election will change nothing, absolutely nothing!
The only real and credible alternative with largely experienced candidates will not be allowed to play anywhere. The supposed alternative, the CDU, is led by the long-standing head of Blackrock Germany. Our economy was completely destroyed by the Greens and the CDU now wants to continue with them. Our justice system is completely in the hands of the system parties. The system of “democracy” in the version of unlimited majority rule is being discredited not only here, but worldwide.
There is still hope for the USA thanks to the now possible return to the original concept, but here all hope is lost.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Thank you for sharing this with us. The problem we see her in the west the Politicians no longer think they work for the people. Hopefully this can be changed where the people have a say and be truly sovereign as it should be.