Well, I guess I'll go beg for some downvotes
Ronaldo (Portugal) is the precedent. In the penultimate qualifying match, he was sent off with a red card and suspended for three international matches. This would have meant he would have been suspended for the first two World Cup matches. Of course, that’s not an option, because world-class stars bring in the cash.
In Argentina’s first match, Messi should have been sent off. Of course, that’s not an option—see above.
The German coach of the English national team, Thomas Tuchel, said it wasn't a red card for the American player. The likely new German national team coach, Jürgen Klopp, said it was a very clear red card.
And FIFA always makes sure that the host nations stay in the tournament as long as possible. History has shown some very strange incidents in this regard. The fact that DJT intervened with Infantino has drawn massive criticism here in Germany—even from media outlets sympathetic to DJT (yes, they do exist). You just don’t do something like that! Especially not when you’re the kind of person who can successfully pull the strings in sports, too. At the press conference, the president portrayed himself as a bit of a fool, which is downright ridiculous. DJT, a fool?
The FIFA sycophants, of course, don’t contradict him, and there’s obviously no one in his inner circle who has even begun to grasp the significance of football—not “soccer,” as it’s only called in the U.S.—for countries around the world. Especially in Latin America and Brazil, soccer is a religion.
While the president may have scored some points at home, abroad he has needlessly revived the image of the “ugly” American. But, karma’s a bitch.
That NGO was financed by the German taxpayer from the beginning of 2025 to date with 900,000 €!
The German government financed the murderer of government employees and the system does not talk about it. Imagine not a Turk but a German, let alone a right winger had done this. The system wuld have activated 100s of 1,000s marching in the streets.
No, that can't be true! It has been scientifically proven that the unvaccinated were responsible for the pandemic. By the same token, that means people who didn't apply sunscreen are responsible for the apocalyptic heat wave. Trust and follow the science.
END OF IRONY
Stephen Goodson’s book describes world history exclusively from the perspective of the “monetary system.” In particular, he provides a detailed account of British history. It becomes clear how many foreign conquests what would later become Great Britain had to endure, where the conquerors came from, and who financed those conquests. A History of Central Banking by Stephen Mitford Goodson
In my opinion, British history reflects the history of the European powers and their actions on the continent, with one significant additional component: the evolving financial system, which had strong roots in the financial sector of northern Italian cities.
Summary: Britain did not develop a high nobility of its “own making.” Instead, it gave rise to what we know today as the Anglo-American banking cartel. As a certain Rothschild once said, “Give me control of the money, and I care not who makes the laws.”
Edited for better readability
How could a political upstart like Prussia, which entered the scene relatively late, have come to play such a dominant role? In my opinion, Cates lacks a deep understanding of history.
“It isn’t much talked about these days. It’s considered ‘in bad taste’ and ‘conspiracy mongering’ to point out that many of the British royals are not ethnic Brits. They came from the region of the old Prussian Empire.”
There was never a Prussian Empire in history!
A German Empire did not exist until after 1871. It was won through three wars against Austria, Denmark, and France, because the “old” monarchies fought with all their might against this upstart, which was economically powerful and experiencing rapid population growth!
He also misunderstands the mechanics of aristocratic marriage policy. An example from the last century may illustrate this:
“Prince Constantine of Greece and Denmark was born on June 2, 1940, at his parents’ former residence, the Villa Psychiko in Psychiko, a wealthy suburb of the Greek capital Athens,[1]. He was the nephew of the then King of Greece, George II, and the only son of the younger brother and heir to the throne, Prince Paul, and his wife, Princess Friederike, a daughter of Duke Ernst August of Brunswick. On his father’s side, he descended from the House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, which had provided the Greek kings since 1863, and on his mother’s side from the Guelphs. His grandmother, Viktoria Luise, was the daughter of the last German emperor, Wilhelm II[2]
His sister Sophia is the former Queen of Spain; his sister-in-law Margrethe II was Queen of Denmark until her abdication in 2024. Prince Philip was a cousin of his father, meaning there are also close family ties to the British royal family. Thus, Constantine was one of the godparents of the current heir to the throne, Prince William." Translated from German Wikipedia
It’s simply not enough to pursue a historical hobbyhorse by starting your “argument” somewhere in the past.
German Brave searches translated:
The personal union between Great Britain and Hanover lasted from 1714 to 1837; during that time, the Elector of Brunswick-Lüneburg (King of Hanover from 1814) was also the monarch of Great Britain. Beginning: The union began in 1714, when George Louis inherited the British throne as George I, after the Act of Settlement of 1701 had established Protestant succession to the English throne. Administration: Despite the shared crown, the national budget and government affairs remained separate; Hanover was administered through the German Chancellery in London and the Privy Council in Hanover. End: The personal union ended in 1837 with the death of William IV, since female succession to the throne was permitted in Great Britain, whereas under Salic law in Hanover, only men were allowed to inherit the throne. Consequence: In Great Britain, Queen Victoria ascended the throne, while the rule in Hanover passed to her uncle Ernst August (Duke of Cumberland). The rulers during these 123 years were George I, George II, George III, George IV, and William IV.
In the German War of 1866, the Kingdom of Hanover fought alongside Austria against Prussia and was defeated. Although the Hanoverian army achieved a tactical Pyrrhic victory at the Battle of Langensalza on June 27, it surrendered just two days later, on June 29, 1866, due to exhaustion, a lack of supplies, and being surrounded by superior Prussian forces. As a result of this defeat, the Kingdom of Hanover was annexed by Prussia on October 1, 1866 and declared the Province of Hanover. The Guelph dynasty under King George V was dethroned, the country lost its sovereignty, and the Hanoverian armed forces were incorporated into the Prussian military.
In the German War of 1866, the Kingdom of Hanover fought alongside Austria against Prussia and was defeated. Although the Hanoverian army achieved a tactical Pyrrhic victory at the Battle of Langensalza on June 27, it surrendered just two days later, on June 29, 1866, due to exhaustion, a lack of supplies, and being surrounded by superior Prussian forces. As a result of this defeat, the Kingdom of Hanover was annexed by Prussia on October 1, 1866 and declared the Province of Hanover. The Guelph dynasty under King George V was dethroned, the country lost its sovereignty, and the Hanoverian armed forces were incorporated into the Prussian military.
The name Mountbatten-Windsor is the personal surname of the direct descendants of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, uniting two family lines of German origin. Mountbatten is the anglicized version of the originally German noble family von Battenberg (from Hesse), from which Prince Philip descends on his mother’s side. Windsor is the name of the British royal house, which George V created in 1917 during World War I from the German-origin House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to accommodate anti-German sentiment. Origins and Name Changes House of Battenberg: A morganatic branch of the House of Hesse-Darmstadt, established in 1851 through the marriage of Prince Alexander of Hesse to Julia Hauke. Transition to Mountbatten: Due to World War I and anti-German sentiment, Louis von Battenberg (Philip’s grandfather) renounced his German titles in 1917 and adopted the English translation Mountbatten. House of Windsor: King George V changed the name of the British monarchy from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor (after the residence in Berkshire) in 1917 to conceal the dynasty’s German origins. Introduction of Mountbatten-Windsor: On February 8, 1960, Queen Elizabeth II decreed by Order in Council that her descendants who do not hold the title “Royal Highness” or Prince/Princess should bear the double surname Mountbatten-Windsor. Officially, the royal family remains the House of Windsor, while Mountbatten-Windsor serves as a personal surname to permanently link Prince Philip’s paternal line to the monarchy.
If you try to summarize 300 years of historical developments in a pithy statement, you usually don’t end up with anything sensible.
In summary:
- The Kingdoms of Great Britain and Hanover were ruled under a personal union for 123 years.
- The Kingdom of Hanover was defeated, dissolved, and annexed by Prussia during the First War of German Unification in 1866, which it fought alongside the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
- The European aristocracy was—and still is—interconnected through numerous marital ties. The nobility had no national obligations (in our understanding of today); what mattered was only one’s own noble house, which did not necessarily have to be tied to a specific state on the map.
- Although the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha is one of the oldest, it did not have its own state in the 19th century.
This problem has been foreseeable for decades. After World War II, the Beetle was produced in Wolfsburg on behalf of the British military government (Lower Saxony was part of the British occupation zone). The British also launched what would later become the world’s largest industrial trade fair for many years in Hanover. More on that later.
VW’s problem is the decisive influence of politics, since the state of Lower Saxony owns 20% of the shares. No one gets ahead at VW who doesn’t align with the state government’s political agenda. For decades now, this agenda has been left-wing and green: green steel, CO2-reduced production processes, and the transition to exclusively electric vehicles. This was coupled with the highest industrial wages and virtually permanent employment for German permanent workers. Management AND employees simply didn’t want to change anything that would curtail their own privileges. Now they’re paying the price! GAME OVER!
Lower Saxony’s political parasites have no options left for action—not just in this state, but anywhere—due to the total debt crisis. But there’s more to this region than just VW! Deutsche Messe AG is owned equally by the state of Lower Saxony and the city of Hanover. Here, too, leadership positions are awarded not based on proven abilities but on political connections. The era of in-person trade shows is definitely over; Germany is no longer an industrial nation, and if you’re not only forbidden from cutting political and socialist dead weight but also lack the ability to do so, the next company will simply go under.
Recently, another of the world’s best cruise ship builders, the Meyer shipyard in Papenburg, has joined the list. The government is providing billions in guarantees. But after the crash, with all those gigantic ships, who will even be able to go on vacation anymore?
In the first quarter, Germany irretrievably lost 483,000 industrial jobs. In return, 160,000 new jobs were created in public administration.
What you—and almost no one over here—are aware of is that not only the private sector but also the institutions of the German government work almost exclusively with Microsoft products and store a large portion of their data in the clouds of U.S. providers (not just Microsoft). To the best of my knowledge—I retired eight years ago—this also applies to a large portion of the data held by the Federal Ministry of Finance.
They’re simply a hypocritical gang that’s trying to somehow save the cis-atlantic part of the deep state—in other words, their own skins.
The movie and its story are completely irrelevant. This is solely about its de facto ban in Germany. Our system is reacting in increasingly irrational ways. In the U.S., the discussion centers mainly on the suppression of free speech; here, once the Streisand effect gains momentum, the question will be why our rulers are so desperate to resort to totalitarian measures to suppress the covering of brutal alien crime.
This week, a “new” report on the neo-Nazi AfD—hailed by the establishment parties—was presented before the Federal Press Conference, comparable to the White House press corps. It was compiled by a radical left-wing NGO funded by Soros and German taxpayer money.
Brace yourselves for even worse news from Germany.
Article by Uwe Boll https://www.tichyseinblick.de/feuilleton/medien/citizen-vigilante-deutschland-fsk/
Reactions here in Germany so far have ranged from cinematic criticism—for example, comparisons to Death Wish or John Wick—to a fundamental rejection of any form of vigilante justice, even within right-wing circles.
But I think the Streisand effect will soon take hold here. Far too many similar things are happening here in Germany. This, combined with the escalating battles over the distribution of ever-dwindling funds—particularly pensions, funding for retirement and nursing homes, kindergartens, and schools—will ensure that it does.
Merz replied that the government simply had different priorities than the AfD and that it, after all, held the parliamentary majority. Furthermore, the majority of the population would think the same way.
Thanks, Elon!
continued:
EDIT lost context: Merz was asked by a AfD member of parliament whether he considers cutting immigration costs, Ukraine armament or development eid instead of taxing the Germans even higher.
Merz replied that the government simply had different priorities than the AfD and that it, after all, held the parliamentary majority. Furthermore, the majority of the population would think the same way.
Thanks, Elon!
"Why ‘Citizen Vigilante’ Is Being Blocked in Germany
By Uwe Boll (**AUTHOR AND DIRECTOR OF THE MOVIE)
Mon, May 25, 2026 While ‘Citizen Vigilante’ is showing in other countries, Uwe Boll’s film has not been approved by the FSK in Germany. Eight reviewers have thus decided that a film about migrant crime, violence, and the failure of the justice system should not reach German audiences.
Developing, financing, and producing a film often takes years and involves an immense financial, emotional, and time investment. Each of my films represents not only money but also the passion and energy of hundreds of crew members. For readers who don’t feel like reading a lengthy article about the FSK (the German Film Industry’s Voluntary Self-Regulation Body), here’s the short version first: I shot the English-language action thriller “Citizen Vigilante” in Croatia, starring U.S. actor Armie Hammer (The Social Network, Death on the Nile, Hotel Mumbai, etc.) and Costas Mandylor (My Big Fat Greek Wedding, Greenland, etc.). The film will be shown in every other country in the world and will generally be accessible to viewers aged 16 and older. It opens in the U.S. on June 19. But not in Germany. According to the FSK, the film promotes vigilante justice. That’s why a review jury—composed like a broadcasting council, a lay judges’ court, or a board of directors—decided not to rate the film for ages 18 and up or assign it the “KJ” rating (not approved for minors), but instead to label it “KK” (no rating). This means that not only should minors under 18 not see the film, but ultimately no one should—regardless of age. Eight people selected by the FSK thus decide what adult citizens in Germany are allowed to watch and what they are not. The “KK” label ensures that all providers in Germany who show or sell films—from Amazon to retailers like Müller and MediaMarkt, as well as movie theaters, streaming services, and TV stations—will not offer the film. The irony is: The film is neither pornographic nor extremely violent. The level of violence is on par with films like John Wick starring Keanu Reeves or The Equalizer starring Denzel Washington. So what is the real reason for this ban? Our main character becomes a wanted terrorist and, at the same time, a social media hero because she hunts down criminals and also takes action against mass rapists. The mass rapists in the film are young migrants, which, according to crime statistics, is unfortunately particularly common in cases of mass rape. Let’s recall a case in Hamburg that, among other things, inspired me to write the screenplay, as I am a filmmaker who likes to grapple with reality in a clear and unflinching way. Of the nine young men convicted, only one actually had to go to prison at the time of the verdict. In November 2023, the Hamburg Regional Court sentenced nine men between the ages of 19 and 23 to juvenile sentences ranging from one year to two years and nine months for the rape of a 15-year-old girl. For eight of the nine convicted men, the sentence was either suspended directly on probation or the decision on suspension was initially left open as part of a so-called “preliminary probation” process. Since the perpetrators were between 17 and 20 years old at the time of the crime, juvenile criminal law was applied, which prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment. The court justified the suspended sentences, among other things, by citing the long time that had elapsed since the crime in 2020 and the perpetrators’ positive social development since then. Two other defendants were acquitted because their involvement in the crime could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Both the judge and the press referred to the “poor, traumatized perpetrators” at the time. This is, of course, a joke and a mockery of the victim, because rape is a serious crime. The court seemed indifferent to victim protection, as the girl in question continues to live in the same city as the perpetrators, who are not in custody. My film is fictional and is subject to entirely different criteria than a documentary. In my assessment, the FSK’s intention with this rating is not only to ensure that minors are protected from the film, but also to ensure that as few people as possible in Germany get to see it at all. Since, according to my research, “Citizen Vigilante” is the only film that takes a critical look at crime committed by migrants, it is precisely this one film—the only one that seeks to portray the reality on the streets, in back alleys, and in the bushes across Europe as it actually unfolds—that is being blocked. In my view, this is a politically motivated decision by the FSK that reflects a larger problem in our society. This problem is the trend—clearly visible for years—of the ruling parties, in collaboration with public broadcasters, NGOs such as Correctiv, as well as taxpayer-funded social media campaigns and reporting platforms like “Trusted Flaggers,” to maintain and expand their power, privileges, and positions under the guise of “do-goodism” and the “fight against Nazis.” Anyone who opposes them is denigrated as anti-democratic and, if necessary, prosecuted under criminal or civil law. In this interpretation, the protection of minors—including under the European Digital Services Act—is merely a façade for political censorship and control of public opinion. Freedom of art must also apply here, in accordance with Article 5, Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 of the Basic Law. It simply states: “Art and science, research and teaching are free.” This fundamental right is among the most strongly protected freedoms in the German Constitution. There is no legal reservation: Unlike freedom of expression under Article 5, Paragraph 2 of the Basic Law, freedom of art contains no explicit restrictions through “general laws.” The state may neither censor art based on its content nor judge whether it is “good” or “bad.” This is the so-called prohibition against the state acting as a judge of art. The protection is comprehensive: Both the creation of the work—that is, the sphere of creation—and its presentation and dissemination—that is, the sphere of impact—are protected, so that art can reach the public at all. The historical background is clear: The framers of the Basic Law enshrined this strong right in direct response to the Nazi dictatorship, during which art was defamed as “degenerate art” and banned. The FSK is using the pretext of protecting minors to undermine the Basic Law in this instance, even though minors would be protected by an 18+ rating. In my case, this is happening because this specific part of the film depicts a reality that people do not want to acknowledge: the reality that mass migration from predominantly Muslim countries has severely undermined the security situation in Germany. Instead of ensuring the safety of the population—for example, by directly deporting non-German criminals and reducing migration from Africa—efforts are being made to suppress reporting on the security threat. With this decision, the FSK may—without even realizing it—be serving not the protection of minors, but the preservation of the current government and its status quo, at the expense of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and artistic freedom. The thousands of criminal complaints that politicians in Germany file against dissatisfied citizens who voice their opinions online are further evidence of the ruling class’s determination to suppress freedom through intimidation. While all my films can be viewed uncut even in Austria—and in 100 other countries as well—I have also had major problems with the FSK in the past regarding six of my films. They were released in Germany only with mandatory cuts. With Citizen Vigilante, this was made impossible this time, as I would essentially have to cut out half the film. Thus, eight people determine what 50 million adults in Germany are allowed to consume. Following Hanau (FSK 16) and Run, Citizen Vigilante is the final part of my trilogy Germany in Winter, which aims to expose the dangers and political consequences of our time and, precisely through its radical narrative style, makes it clear that violence is not a solution. Our character Sanders is not a good person and is not portrayed as one either. He is not a comic-book character like Batman, but a selfish, very wealthy businessman who, out of boredom, so to speak, begins to take justice into his own hands. Drug gangsters, teenage bullies, and two men who want to use drugs to subdue women are brought to justice. He goes to a brothel because no one loves him and he doesn’t love anyone either; he’d rather pay for sex. When, in the end, he shoots teenage rapists along with an entire family and kills the judge who failed to send those rapists to prison, it’s so harsh and shocking that the viewer is more likely to conclude that this violence goes too far. I’m a genre filmmaker, but I’ve always been a political filmmaker as well (Darfur, Postal, Assault on Wall Street, Rampage, Barschel, etc.). All my films have received R ratings in the U.S. and in every other country in the world—meaning they’re rated for audiences 16 and older. Only in Germany was this often different, and many films had to be cut in order to even receive an 18+ rating. In the case of Rampage, in which a mass murderer gets away with it, I had to cut several gory scenes and include a note in the end credits stating that the main character was apprehended by the police in order to obtain a rating. When Rampage 2 came out, many viewers in Germany asked how it could be that he wasn’t in prison. That was a direct infringement on artistic freedom and caused me harm, because Rampage and all the other censored Boll films would have been better received by critics and audiences if they had remained uncut. Movies must show reality, comment on it, and even cause pain. They must be able to make people angry and spark discussions. In Run, I show my empathy for migrants; in Hanau, the madness of a deluded racist gunman; and in Citizen Vigilante, a dark character who doesn’t really bring about justice, even if he commits acts that some people approve of. In an age when even children can see real-life killings and pornography at any time on streaming services and social media platforms, the FSK has lost any justification for its existence anyway. We even have to pay over 1,000 euros for these unnecessary reviews. In most countries—such as Austria, Scandinavia, or the Benelux countries—there is no FSK. There, the film distributors themselves indicate on a DVD or in the stream the minimum age for which a film is suitable. For horror movies, for example, the cover says “18 and up,” because no one wants to watch horror movies rated for ages 12 and up—fans expect violence and blood. These self-assigned ratings are by no means misleading; they are sufficient. The FSK should be abolished. Alternatively, DVD retailers and at least the streaming platforms should distance themselves from it and announce that they will no longer adhere to FSK ratings."
https://www.tichyseinblick.de/feuilleton/medien/citizen-vigilante-deutschland-fsk/
Reactions here in Germany so far have ranged from cinematic criticism—for example, comparisons to Death Wish or John Wick—to a fundamental rejection of any form of vigilante justice, even within right-wing circles.
But I think the Streisand effect will soon take hold here. Far too many similar things are happening here in Germany. This, combined with the escalating battles over the distribution of ever-dwindling funds—particularly pensions, funding for retirement and nursing homes, kindergartens, and schools—will ensure that it does.
German Brave translatedt:
The Marshall Plan (officially the European Recovery Program) was not purely a grant program, but consisted primarily of low-interest loans and in-kind deliveries. From 1948 to 1952, a total of 12.4 billion U.S. dollars flowed to Western Europe, with West Germany—the fourth-largest recipient—receiving approximately 1.5 billion dollars in the form of loans and goods. Financing and Repayment Counterpart System: The funds were primarily used to purchase capital goods, mostly from U.S. companies. Local recipients (businesses, governments) purchased these goods and deposited the equivalent amounts in local currency with national trust funds. Reuse: These counterpart funds did not flow back to the U.S., but were instead reallocated as ERP loans (European Recovery Program) to European companies and governments. This system enabled a cyclical financing process in which repayments of new loans fed into further lending. Duration: Loan repayments to the U.S. were handled bilaterally; West Germany did not complete repayment of its Marshall Plan loans until 1966. Historical Legacy The financing structures that emerged from the Marshall Plan continue to this day. In Germany, the program is carried on by the KfW Bank, which continues to grant low-interest development loans for desirable projects; while the original U.S. funds are no longer directly involved, the principle of low-interest loans has been preserved. AI-generated response. Please verify the facts.
This might be a bit off-topic, but the developments in New York have made me think of the following. We’ve often discussed here the various roles of Washington, D.C., the City of London, and the Vatican in controlling the world. We know that DC’s role was the military enforcement of the Deep State’s will, and that of the City of London was financial domination. DC has largely been dismantled, and the City of London is currently being destroyed. But! In my view, the tasks carried out for the Deep State in those cities cannot be completely separated from one another.
Many of London’s activities are mirrored or duplicated by Wall Street. To slay the financial dragon, one must ensure that it does not rise again elsewhere. So, they are ensuring—or at least not preventing—that NYC sinks into communism. Ultimately, this is likely to force the part of New York’s (financial) economy that will still be needed or useful in the future to leave the city and make a fresh start in Florida or Texas. In my view, this would ultimately lead to the end of the coastlines’ ill-fated dominance in the future.
These are just my thoughts from a Germany that has long since been destroyed. I’m not in a position to assess what that would mean for New York state as a whole.
"...have much lower medical expenses because they're heavily subsidized."
In Germany we pay so called "Sozialabgaben":
Translated Brave: "Social security contributions in Germany are legally mandated contributions that provide coverage for illness, long-term care, old age, unemployment, and accidents. They are calculated based on gross pay and are generally split 50-50 between employees and employers. The total contribution burden for employees subject to social security contributions is currently approximately 21% of gross pay. The individual contribution rates are as follows: Pension insurance: 9.3% (employee share) Health insurance: 7.3% plus half of the additional contribution (on average) Long-term care insurance: 1.525% to 2.0% (depending on family status) Unemployment insurance: 1.2%"
Germany is totally broke. The System is going to cut the Federal share of the above "insurances". Germany is about to explode.
I agree, but it’s just a gesture—it has no real power. EU regulations are generally directly applicable law in the member states. In Germany, almost everything is waved through by the Bundestag without scrutiny or debate. If it ever really comes to the point where an EU regulation doesn’t suit those in power in the member states, they will very quickly remind themselves of their national legislative authority.
Real change can ONLY come from the people in the member states
Dead on Arrival! The Commission will dilute it beyond recognition in the process.
German Brave translated: "The European Parliament (EP), together with the Council of the European Union, is the EU’s primary legislative body. Since the Treaty of Lisbon, both institutions have had equal authority in the legislative process and must agree on a draft for an EU law to be adopted. The ordinary legislative procedure This procedure, also known as the codecision procedure, applies to the vast majority of policy areas (85 areas in total). The process usually follows these steps: Initiative: The European Commission submits a legislative proposal (the Commission has the sole right of initiative, although the EP, the Council, or citizens’ initiatives may call for one). First reading: The EP and the Council review the proposal. The EP may propose amendments. Second reading: If the Council and the EP cannot reach an agreement, the EP may reject the draft by an absolute majority or propose further amendments. Conciliation Committee: In the event of a deadlock, a committee composed of equal numbers of MEPs and Council ministers is convened to draft a joint text. Third reading: The joint text must be re-approved by both institutions for the law to enter into force. Trilogue negotiations: In practice, the process is often expedited through informal negotiations between the Commission, the EP, and the Council at all stages."
Our media are only just beginning to face headwinds. My generation of “old farts,” in particular, still believes the nonsense that the public media feed us—and for which every German who isn’t homeless and living under a bridge has to pay €18.36 per month per household. Funnily enough, this broadcasting fee was introduced under the Nazis. Our leftists, however, either don't know this, or they prefer to ignore it.
Alternative media have only been around for a little over two years, but they’re rapidly gaining reach. Politicains and their sycophants are scared and don´t know how to handle it and retreat to outright censorship in both the EU and it´s member states. They will fail!
ZDF lied outrageously once again this week by claiming that Elon Musk had called for a hunt for immigrants following the attempted beheading in Belfast. Germany’s most renowned media lawyer, Joachim Steinhoefel, is now taking legal action against ZDF on his behalf.
The “journalists,” who until now have been able to lie and slander with impunity, have not yet realized that those days are over.
Thank you. I, 73, have been familiar with Gladio since the 1990s. I first read about Prussiagate here two years ago. I have long been aware of the three entities—Washington, D.C., the City of London, and Vatican City—and their roles in world domination.
Despite the knowledge I’ve acquired outside the official historical narrative, I have massive difficulty with the idea of Prussia playing an active role in transforming the American Republic into a corporation, especially since unified Germany had enough problems of its own in Europe during that period. The long period of prosperity and peace up to 1914 was not yet foreseeable. And then I cannot explain why the Anglo-American banking cartel pushed for the destruction of the three empires—Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia—shortly thereafter (Mackinder, Rhodes Society...).
Nor can I logically place the collaboration between organizations that were actually enemies (Freemasons, Jesuits...) in many areas of hidden history within a timeline.
They made SA police!
Brave; German Wikipedia This was a paramilitary unit founded in February 1933 by Hermann Göring in Prussia to support the regular police forces and combat political opponents of the National Socialists. Recruitment came primarily from the ranks of the Sturmabteilung (SA), but also from the SS and the Stahlhelm, thereby granting SA members official police powers. Size: In Prussia, approximately 40,000 to 50,000 SA and SS members, as well as Stahlhelm members, were drafted as auxiliary police. Duties: The focus was on the terrorist elimination of political opponents (especially Communists and Social Democrats), arbitrary arrests, and the establishment of “wild” concentration camps. Dissolution: The unit was disbanded in August 1933, as its duties were taken over by the regular police and the SS after the NSDAP had consolidated its power.
The auxiliary police forces were soon disbanded because the German civil service in all states and areas of responsibility had effectively Nazified itself by joining the party. Longtime party members referred to them as the “March Martyrs.”
After the so-called “Reichskristallnacht,” German Jews who were permitted to leave the country were required to surrender a large portion of their assets as the so-called “Reich Emigration Tax.”
Today, a law similar to the Dutch one has existed in Germany for quite some time. Hardly anyone knows this.
"A gripping account of the real causes of the 6 Day War; Uncovers the true reasons for the bombing of the USS Liberty; Reveals that the world was on the brink of nuclear conflict – and why it was kept quiet." https://peterhounam.com/books/operation-cyanide/
https://de.scribd.com/document/410826276/Operation-Cyanide-by-Peter-Hounam-2003-pdf
A new position had to be found for the Green Party’s failed foreign minister, so the German diplomat Helga Schmid—who had actually been earmarked for the role and had already been “negotiated” for it at the UN—was sidelined. The replacement was carried out with typical Green Party empathy.
Brave:
"Annalena Baerbock ousted top German diplomat Helga Schmid in the nomination for President of the UN General Assembly. Helga Schmid had been designated by the German government as the candidate for the post since September 2024 and was regarded as an internationally respected expert (including as a former OSCE Secretary General).
The decision to nominate Baerbock instead of Schmid was sharply criticized by critics such as former top diplomat Christoph Heusgen and Sigmar Gabriel; Heusgen called it an “outrage.”
Germany’s reputation in the EU and Europe is steadily deteriorating. Then, on the day before the vote, our “lying chancellor” publicly boasted that the German government and diplomatic corps—and he himself in particular—had worked intensively to ensure the election would be a success, as it always had been.
Well! Pride comes before a fall.
English Wikipedia:
"Finland In Finland, the swastika (Finnish: hakaristi) was used as the official national marking of the Finnish Air Force between 1918 and 1945, anti-aircraft troops as a part of the air force, and tank troops at that time.
Its origin is unrelated to Nazis. In March 1918 during the Finnish Civil War a Swedish count Eric von Rosen (who was not a Nazi in 1918 yet) gave the Finnish Whites an aircraft. The aircraft was marked with von Rosen's badge, a blue swastika on a white background. The Finnish Air Force adopted this roundel as their national insignia.[13]
The swastika was also used by the Lotta Svärd organisation, a Finnish paramilitary organisation for women, which was dissolved in 1944 according to the terms of the Moscow Armistice.
Variations of the tursaansydän symbol[14] The tursaansydän, an elaboration on the swastika, is used by scouts in some instances and by a student organization.[which?] The Finnish village of Tursa uses the tursaansydän as a kind of a certificate of authenticity on products made there, and is the origin of this name of the symbol (meaning 'heart of Tursa'), which is also known as the mursunsydän ('walrus-heart'). Traditional textiles are still made in Finland with swastikas as parts of traditional ornaments.
The Finnish Airforce units still wear a swastika on their colours.[15][16] In addition, the shoulder insignia of the Airforce Headquarters bears a swastika design.[17] In 1945, the Air Force changed its national emblem to a roundel, but the use of swastika in some other insignia was continued. In 1958, the President of Finland Urho Kekkonen inaugurated the colours of the Air Force units which feature a swastika design. The latest colour of this pattern was inaugurated by president Tarja Halonen 25 October 2005 for the newly formed Air Force Academy.[17] Also the Utti Jaeger Regiment, responsible for training special forces, bears a swastika-like emblem (sun cross) on its colour. In January 2017, the Air Force Command replaced its emblem, which had contained a swastika, with a design reminiscent of the Air Force service emblem; a golden eagle and a circle of wings.[18]
The swastika has not disappeared in Finnish medals and decorations. The decorations of the Order of the Cross of Liberty, designed by Akseli Gallen-Kallela – who also designed the emblem of the Finnish Air Force and the Finnish flight mark in 1918 – bears a swastika laid on a George's Cross. The President of Finland uses a Cross of Liberty in the personal flag. However, in the flag is only the 3rd Cross of Liberty, although the highest Finnish decoration is the Grand Cross of the White Rose of Finland with Collar. During the Continuation War and immediately after the wars, 191 soldiers were appointed Knights of the Mannerheim Cross."
It’s something you can know, but obviously you don’t have to.
They did that, but only because under communism everyone was supposed to receive everything according to their needs—which, given the economic situation, even the dumbest person would have recognized as an idiotic lie.
Ideologically, socialism was a transitional phase to communism. Since it, too, obviously could no longer stand up to comparison with reality, they called it “real-existing socialism.”