Reply 1 of 2:

I will reply directly to this post to address a lot of your inaccuracies as well as lack of knowledge. The problem is that you are making a lot of assumptions and yet you think you are telling the truth.

Let's begin:

You did not live there during the Stalin and Hitler years.

I didn't, but my parents and grandparents lived there. All of them are in agreement that times were tough, but fair. When asked who do they think is the best USSR ruller, Stalin sits at the front of the queue by a country mile.

I can also go on about how Nazis treated my grandparents during the occupation of their village. I can tell you how they executed my anti-communist great grandpa right in front of my grandma and her sister. I can tell you how the German allies(the Romanians) beat my grandma senseless for refusing to hand over her horse because they needed it for the war effort. I can also tell you how both the Germans and Romanians confiscated all her livestock and chickens almost causing them to die of starvation. I can also tell about how the Romanians forcefully drafted my grandma's 17 year old brother(even though he wasn't an adult) and sent him to die not from Stalingrad.

But I won't bore you with the details, since this is an emotional argument after all.

I care about what EVIDENCE can be presented to support a claim. You have presented NONE

What? There is a reason I called your argument a smooth brain take, because clearly if you can't see any evidence despite me presenting tons of it, is a problem.

a housing program where everyone could own their own home. For each child born, 1/4 of the mortgage was forgiven. Have 4 children, and you own your own home free and clear.

Umm, not sure how to tell you this, but in the USSR any married couple was entered in line to receive a free apartment/house(depending if they lived in the city/village)free of charge from day 1. The more kids you had, the bigger the arrangement. For example: my dad received a 3 bedroom apartment once he turned 24. My ex's dad got a free 5 bedroom 3 bathroom apartment because he had a large family.

So believe it or not, programs like the one you mentioned existed not in the Reich alone. As a matter of fact, the free apartment program was scrapped with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. And now the "free" Russians are debt slaves to their mortgage.

They wanted to take out Germany because it had become an economic threat by having such great success under Hitler's economic policy

Again, they became an economic power house because of the billions poured by the cabal banking system and their oil companies. Once the investment dried up, Germans were almost starving, hence they had to invade the USSR to get Ukraine and the Caucaus range for food and oil. But don't worry, they did that because the Soviets were conveniently plotting to attack them first.

The Russians had no problem with the czar.

You need to study Russian history more. Pre bolshevik Russia was a backwater feudal agrarian society with a caste system. The peasants were treated like real slaves even though they were "free". The boiling point was WWI which was preceded by a couple of major famines(pretty common under the Russian empire btw). The point is that contrary to the dominating narrative here, Russia was in a far worse shape as an Empire rather than under the commies.

In hindsight, yes. That is because Stalin double-crossed him.

You do know that both USSR and Nazi Germany fought against each other during the Spanish civil war?

You also do know that USSR wanted to assist the Allies during the annexation of Czechoslovakia?

The notion that they were friends or allies is plain wrong. The Molotov Ribentrop pact was response from the USSR to buy themselves some time to arm up because they were falling way behind.

Stalin's plan was to take over all of Europe, though, and Hitler did stop that.

This theory is not supported by a simple litmus test, and that is that the USSR was in the middle of reorganizing it's army.

Why you might ask? Because Germany at the time had an army of 3 million men. USSR had an army of 1.5 million men despite being 3x as big. In 1938 they started reorganizing their army and increased the number to 5 million. When Germany attacked them they were in the middle of the said organization hence why they suffered such catastrophic losses. Suffice to say, when they got their shit together around 1943, they simply curbstomped the Nazi machine.

How do I know USSR wasn't planning to attack Germany?

Winter war. The top Soviet brass understood that if little Finland can give them such a bloody nose, imagine what the best army on the continent can do.

According to the Soviet archives that I read, they were estimating that their army would finish the reorganization process around 1943/1944. So the notion that they were ready to attach is false simply because their army wasn't ready.

What about Stalin invading the Baltics and Poland?

Those were historic Russian lands that were taken during the Soviet civil war. As such they were returning them to their original owners.

If he got rid of the faggots in the 1920's, and if Moscow was the depravity capital of Europe at that time, it is only because the jews were the ones in control until Stalin walked in the door.

I have not looked into Stalin nearly as much as I have Hitler.

You should. You'd be surprised what you're going to find. As a disclaimer, the english internet only has smear campaigns against him which kind of contradict your points below.

The lies about Stalin are to make him look good when in fact he was evil. The lies about Hitler are to make him look evil when in fact he was good.

You are thinking of Lenin. There is not a single article that portrays Stalin in a positive light on the english side of the internet. As a matter of fact try finding one positive article about Stalin. You won't. Not even the lefties will acknowldge him as one of their own. Now look up Lenin and Trotskii to see the difference.

And yet, plenty of articles and even youtube channels(zoomer historian) who speak positively of Hitler. There are entire forums dedicated to talking about what a great man he is.

By comparison, I can only find positive things about Stalin on the Russian side of the internet.

All USSR citizens were FUCKING SLAVES. NO PROPERTY.

That's false. Soviet citizens owned apartments, cars, jewlery, vacation homes. The real estate was given to you by the state, free of charge from day 1. Everything else could be bought using money interest free. There were no loans as I mentioned.

That would be counter to communism, as communism demands conformity.

I can tell you've never lived in a traditional society. Traditionalism is about conformity. The man is the head of the household while the wife raises the kids. The husband is the provider, while the wife takes care of the household.

If as a man or woman, you don't like any of this, sucks to be you, because everyone is like this and you should too, or your community will think that you are crazy. And no, I'm not making this up.

Look at the Amish for example and see how much conformity is expected of them. I guess they must be commies as well, right?

You want me to believe that the USSR was a special brand of communism? I don't.

Don't know what to tell you, but there was only one country that rivaled the US in the last century technologically or military, and that country was USSR.

So did I. And my parents could own a house.

Your parents or you don't own your house. Don't believe me? Stop paying your property tax and see how long you are going to own your house. This was a thing even when your parents were in their 20's. As long as you have to pay tax on anything, you are just leasing it from the government.

In the USSR people owned their homes till they died without paying a dime. But somehow they were slaves. Meanwhile someone who has to work all their life to pay off their home and lose when they miss 1 tax payment is considered free.

As for the US not having fluoride, porn, drugs is just downright lie.

Fluoride has been in the water since the 1920's.

My wife who was born and raised in the US told me about the porn industry and how big it was back in 1970's and 1980's.

And are you seriously going to tell me the US had no drugs, when even the fucking hippies were popularizing that shit as far back as the 1960's?

As a mentioned, none of these factors were a thing in the USSR. So by default a country that has no porn, no LGBTQ, no drugs, no fluoride and no usury by default can't be jewish controlled.

But again, this has nothing to do with Nazi Germany.

Which years are you talking about? Pre- or Post-1991?

Pre 1991.

Germany was the #1 economy in the world under Hitler, so OF COURSE there would be A LOT of economic trade -- especially the usual deep state suspects.

Germany wasn't the No.1 economy in the world since the early 1900. There was not a point in the war were they held that position.

The only time they became a powerhouse is when they annexed the industry rich lands of Czechslovakia and Austrria. Only then were they able to trully challenge the rest of Europe.

Mind you this still happened with the full cooperation of the Allied powers who according to you were looking to take them down.

The country that was the #1 economic powerhouse in the world was the US. During the WW2, the US outproduced the entire world combined. You can check all the industry metrics and compare them to Nazi Germany and the USSR.

I would think as someone who claims to be a patriot, you would know and be proud of your ancestors, but for whatever reason you spend more time glorifying a regime that has nothing to do with your country. A regime that is at odds with the US Constitution and that has a Socialism element(in before: it wasn't real socialism even though the government literally decided how citizens live their daily lives).

As a sidenote: notice how the US economy stayed strong all the way till the USSR collapsed. And only then did the cabal start the controlled demolition of this country.

Some food for thought.

P.S. I'm off to work, I will include part 2 once I get back.