PLEASE Help Me Understand.......

posted 21 days ago by Ffairchild 21 days ago by Ffairchild +27 / -0

Why? Why does The Brunson SCOTUS Case get downvoted here? The case is HISTORIC. (First case brought by an individual that made it to the Supreme Court)

Trump is all about the Rule of Law. Loy has used the legal system and made it to the Supreme Court. Now he's asking Americans to send letters to SCOTUS in support of this case. Isn't that exactly what is meant by

WE THE PEOPLE?

All the heavy lifting was done by Loy. Are we really going to pass up this opportunity to get our voices heard? Think of it as a "Class Action" lawsuit.

I'll post this again.

Public perception influences SCOTUS and Loy's campaign for letters could be the key to hearing this case. What if SCOTUS received a million letters? The evidence is so clear; 388 defendant's violated their Oath of Office by certifying the 2020 election.

I think it's a big mistake not taking this seriously.

22 comments

22 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (22)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– RedPillQ17 2 points 20 days ago +2 / -0

I doubt you'll find anyone here who doesn't believe in the MERITS of the Brunson brothers' SCOTUS cases and I'm pretty sure we all would have LOVED to have seen something come of them. But their cases been shut down repeatedly (denied and denied again) by the SCOTUS, despite getting docketed for consideration (only discussed in conference by the Justices - but never got approved to move forward to trial).

My understanding (but I'm not a lawyer) is that there's a limited number of tries anyone has to be granted a SCOTUS case hearing/trial - one can't just keep trying forever. According to everything I've seen on the SCOTUS dockets and from interviews I've seen with the plaintiffs in these cases, the Brunson cases have been exhausted with the SCOTUS, and unfortunately without ever getting their cases moved to an actual trial.

Here's a few links about this that may be helpful:

Rayland Brunson: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

Loy Brunson: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-1028.html

SCOTUS hearing denial then reverts back to decision of lower court: https://theappellatelawfirm.com/blog/supreme-court/

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q