We can detect and destroy these instantly.
Never forget , the modern weapons the public is aware of was modern 20 years ago.
Also the same with Russia. Good reasons to have reciprocal relationships with other nations
Not Mach 10. Not easily. Not instantly. We did not send the THAAD system to Ukraine, which is the only system that might be able to engage these missiles.
That you know of . This is my point . The xr22 blackbird was being used since 1969 but not public until the 80s. As far as hypersonic and space travel all is still dark. Don't doubt me
You are; either mistakenly referring to the SR-71 Blackbird, or to some other presently unknown aircraft. The Blackbird was common knowledge before 1970. I and a friend saw a rapid contrail that year, which we timed and estimated to be at Mach 3, and there was only one aircraft capable of that.
Don't doubt you? I've only been in the advanced aerospace business for 40 years, and keep my ear to the rail. Why should I believe you, when you seem to get your information garbled? Lots of imaginary technology touted on this page.
You are correct . I'm old and don't remember alpha numeric named aircraft that aren't relevant anymore. The SR 71 ( thanks for that) was NOT common knowledge. Don't doubt me .kek
We can detect and destroy these instantly. Never forget , the modern weapons the public is aware of was modern 20 years ago. Also the same with Russia. Good reasons to have reciprocal relationships with other nations
Not Mach 10. Not easily. Not instantly. We did not send the THAAD system to Ukraine, which is the only system that might be able to engage these missiles.
That you know of . This is my point . The xr22 blackbird was being used since 1969 but not public until the 80s. As far as hypersonic and space travel all is still dark. Don't doubt me
You are; either mistakenly referring to the SR-71 Blackbird, or to some other presently unknown aircraft. The Blackbird was common knowledge before 1970. I and a friend saw a rapid contrail that year, which we timed and estimated to be at Mach 3, and there was only one aircraft capable of that.
Don't doubt you? I've only been in the advanced aerospace business for 40 years, and keep my ear to the rail. Why should I believe you, when you seem to get your information garbled? Lots of imaginary technology touted on this page.
You are correct . I'm old and don't remember alpha numeric named aircraft that aren't relevant anymore. The SR 71 ( thanks for that) was NOT common knowledge. Don't doubt me .kek