Im the same. It's terrible. What about starling? My work just got it and me and my sensitive friend feel it so badly. At least we think that's what it is.
EMF sensitive person here. There’s indeed the possibility that background radiation levels could cause problems, but always start from physics. The law of inverse squares applies to all radiation: when you double the distance you cut the exposure by 4. So whether it’s Starlink or anything else, the most important thing to consider is whatever is radiating close to you. If you are close enough to a cell tower or other high powered digital microwave transmitter, that can also reach similar exposure levels. It’s nearly certain that you are getting incomparably more EMF radiation exposure from sources in or near you than from things like Starlink satellites. There are meters you can get that are very instructive on what is happening, what provides effective shielding, and what doesn’t.
It could be the router. People scream about 5g but when you measure the radiation coming off a router it's bonkers. You can get a bag that dampers the output or look for routers that only come on when prompted. Or wire the house for ethernet.
Wired is most preferable anyway. Better speeds and reliability. Sadly, I know not everyone can do that, but there exists, in some routers, a setting where you adjust the power of the WiFi signal to where you can reduce the pulses from 10/second to 1/second. It helps a lot and the signal isn't really worsened (connectivity).
Im the same. It's terrible. What about starling? My work just got it and me and my sensitive friend feel it so badly. At least we think that's what it is.
EMF sensitive person here. There’s indeed the possibility that background radiation levels could cause problems, but always start from physics. The law of inverse squares applies to all radiation: when you double the distance you cut the exposure by 4. So whether it’s Starlink or anything else, the most important thing to consider is whatever is radiating close to you. If you are close enough to a cell tower or other high powered digital microwave transmitter, that can also reach similar exposure levels. It’s nearly certain that you are getting incomparably more EMF radiation exposure from sources in or near you than from things like Starlink satellites. There are meters you can get that are very instructive on what is happening, what provides effective shielding, and what doesn’t.
Ya, i can't even have wifi in my home. everything is hard wired.
Exactly how I do it. Wireless ONLY if I need for a few minutes. Sadly, I have 2 phones when on the clock...
I use ethernet cords running all o er my home. I drill holes through flooring etc.
It could be the router. People scream about 5g but when you measure the radiation coming off a router it's bonkers. You can get a bag that dampers the output or look for routers that only come on when prompted. Or wire the house for ethernet.
Wired is most preferable anyway. Better speeds and reliability. Sadly, I know not everyone can do that, but there exists, in some routers, a setting where you adjust the power of the WiFi signal to where you can reduce the pulses from 10/second to 1/second. It helps a lot and the signal isn't really worsened (connectivity).
Interesting. I didn't know about reducing the pulses. Thanks.
If it is using the same frequencies (which it has to for wireless devices to communicate), then yes, it is harmful.