Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

From what I am reading here it sounds like he is talking about a more involved point and not just stating anything in a general fashion.

This is also over a year old and some of the more damning comprehensive research on the Vax has only been released within the last 6-12 months. (I know that's hard to buy for us as Anons because of how long we have known and suspected but its true; consider that only recently the vax was shelved etc)

He is saying thatbif a pregnant woman has NOT had Covid before he would, in general, reccomend her to get it, but ONLY a one-dose vax not the two part shot most commonly received by Americans - interesting, that last caveat in particular.

Furthermore he IS taking into account natural immunity (so he isn't a Fauci worshiping psychotic), and he says only that he would reccomend it nothing stronger than that. Doctors recommend flu shots every year, some take them and some don't, that's the way I would interpret him.

But he then acknowledges that having no safety or efficacy data that is reliable is antithetical to providing good healthcare and will destroy public trust, which was I think the larger subject at issue in the exchange this was pulled from.

See what Dr. Naomi Wolf says about him. I trust very few anymore, but she has been a consistently reliable whistleblower against this criminal enterprise based on fraudulent medicine from the beginning.