.....
Despite various debunkings, the Western establishment is still policing Covid-19 narratives nearly five years later â even when the latest bombshell suggests a US national security coverup.
A former head of the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is being accused of spreading fake news for making statements that fall outside the acceptable Covid-related dogma that the Western establishment deems etched into history as indisputable fact.
Dr. Robert Redfield, the virologist who served as CDC director during President Donald Trumpâs first term, said on a recent podcast that the Covid virus was âintentionally engineered as part of a biodefense program,â and that âthe US role was substantial,â citing research funded by the âNational Institutes of Health, the State Department, USAID, and the Defense Department.â
He specifically attributed the probable creation of âsome of the original viral linesâ to a researcher at the University of North Carolina, although conceded that he couldnât actually prove it. Yeah, well, thatâs what hearings with the power to compel evidence and testimony under threat of imprisonment are for â not a podcast. How about getting that researcher on the stand?
âScientists agree that there is no evidence to suggest that Covid-19 originated in a lab in any country,â Newsweek wrote in reporting on Redfieldâs remarks. Actually, there is at least some smoke to suggest a potential fire. In 2021, Newsweek itself contacted Dr. Anthony Fauci, who served as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) during Trumpâs first term. Fauci clarified that the research the US âsupported in China, where coronaviruses are prevalent, sought to understand the behavior of coronaviruses circulating in bats that have the potential to cause widespread disease. The body of science produced by this research demonstrates that the bat coronavirus sequences published from that work NIH supported were not SARS-CoV-2.â
Fauci added that the US-backed gain of function research wasnât applied to viruses that could infect humans. Guess itâs just an incredibly wild and unlucky coincidence then that the global epicenter for the outbreak just happened to take place near a lab funded by Washington in China, where they were doing gain of function work on some viruses â just not on the exact virus that happened to cause global mayhem.
And weâre supposed to just take Fauciâs word for it, I guess. Weâre talking about the same guy who appeared on TV in a cloth mask covered in the logo of his favorite sports team and told everyone to do the same as though the only thing standing between life and death was a pair of grandmaâs pantyhose wrapped around your face. Then he told Americans not to invite unvaccinated family members over for the holidays, despite the fact that it failed to actually prevent transmission or infection.
During the podcast interview, Redfield also reframed Chinaâs responsibility in a way that would likely annoy the Western establishment. âWhen you look at the accountability for China, their accountability is not in the lab work and in the creation of the virus. Their accountability is not following the international health regulations after they realized they had a problem,â he said, seemingly implying that it was American interests that spearheaded the research project.
Again, why is mainstream America learning about this via some obscure show? This guy even testified at a Covid congressional hearing, but his position was far from audible. âIt was told to me that they wanted a single narrative, and that I obviously had a different point of view,â Redfield previously said, according to the BBC. âScience has debate and they squashed any debate,â he added, in a nod to Fauci. The White House has admitted that there isnât even consensus across the US government on the Covid virusâ origin, yet they seem entirely satisfied with the lack of answers.
Despite the lingering uncertainties, the establishment press is quick to dismiss anyone who doesnât support the theory that it came from some random bat or other animal that some dude ate in China. The scientific community and the Western establishment gate-keep their Covid-related narratives as consensus, and anyone who dares to deviate is written off as a kook â even if the dissenting view, in this case, is expressed by one of Americaâs leading health authorities during the Covid fiasco.
This is the same âscientific communityâ that largely shrugged off the social applications of their âscienceâ when it led to things like surfers wandering along empty beaches alone being chased down and tackled by cops in the interest of public health. Itâs the same community thatâs equally intolerant of any dissent related to their manmade climate change theory.
Why is debate even remotely controversial when there are still so many unanswered questions? And itâs not like the issue is benign or entirely in the rear-view mirror. Some people are still so traumatized by the tsunami of official government propaganda related to the overwhelmingly survivable (and now largely forgotten) virus that they havenât stopped regularly running out to top up on their Covid jabs, which have never actually met the time-tested definition of a vaccine.
Recently, some American jurisdictions have even taken action to stop people jonesing for their next injection to treat their state-sponsored psychological trauma a half-decade later. Officials in Texas and Florida have actively blocked jab promotion and marketing campaigns. A regional public health authority in Ohio has recently blocked it from even being available.
Last year, the House Oversight Committee identified a âhighly credibleâ senior CIA officer who told them that the CIA had offered financial incentive to a group of analysts working on the Covid origin question to support the natural transmission theory over the lab leak theory. If CIA involvement canât be dismissed, then why ignore the possibility of other related national security agenciesâ involvement?
Achieving greater transparency on the discreet role of government agencies in the Covid debacle sounds like the perfect job for Trumpâs new nominee for health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has long suspected the involvement of the CIA in the assassination of his uncle, President John F. Kennedy, citing the former presidentâs refusal to send troops to Vietnam.
Western governments from the US to France have classified Covid-related information and deliberations. Sounds like it would be a good time to reopen the conversation, starting with the public release of any secret âCovid filesâ â all in the interest of science, of course.
.....
https://www.rt.com/news/608068-covid-cdc-lab-leak-us/
.....
I believe the stories that University of N.C. was doing gain of function, but d/t the ban on G of F it was moved to Wuhan and maybe Ukraine. Our U.S. government is trying to put the blame on China, when the U.S. government was the major culprit.
Ralph Baric at UNC Chappel Hill was given a grant of $40 billion to create it.
Yep. He needs to be held accountable for his part in it.
Agreed. I believe that ((( it))) was moved to Ukraine from U.N.C. And I also have seen evidence of German diplomats (needs verification, and it may have disappeared). Diplomatic movements are supposed to be Public Information, however. Diplomats are also handy carriers/mules for non-disclosure-bu diclosable items like medical research samples, that would otherwise set off all sorts of alarms at borders and airport security). In this instance the dates were of interest: they were visiting Kiev, and flying back to Germany (totally innocent, of course), a couple of days before the Wuhan Military Games started. I saw it, I think I screen-grabbed it, but at the time, it was just such a stretch. Such info is sketchy evidence because one has to prove intent when no documented crime took place, which it didn't. Just saying, then.
In My Opinion (IMO) : The Wuhan Military Games were Ground Zero for a spread of a (mysteriouss) SARS-like snot-virus - easy to do in a crowded stadium + controlled dormitories = everyone dieded. Plenty of plausible deniability. And lots of the partcipants did get sick. Mind you - that may have been an energetic jab campaign on all the foreign participants, as part of the 'rules' of entering the country as a foreigner. Just to confirm: I have witnessed visitors returning from China and dying within weeks. I know, it is a case study, not data persay.
So even here, there is nuance - the Wuhan Flu may have just been a mass vaccine-reaction. Natural? Man-made? Akshully, kinda both, and the paradox only deepens:
There was certainly a mass illness during that 2019 event. But key points are that:
a) The Wuhan Flu was not necessarily what they had in the already-developing supposedly, mRNA-genetic-mutilation-lab-thingemee (CV19).
b) the Wuhan 2019 event appeared 'natural' in spread at Ground Zero (hence, Wuhan Flu).
c) Those programs (CV19 - research, and Wuhan Flu) were still separate when (((they, as in, MSM and all related mouthpieces))) started up the controversy - again, for plausible deniabillity. It was so easy ro do, because 'both' theories were true, and, of course, they needed lots of controversy - the more the better, as it is all free advertising.
d) the two 'bugs' and also 'theories' were to be merged at a later date.
But the location was chosen because of plausible deniability: i.e. the presence of bright-and-shiny new research lab, built using American $Money$. Anybody with half a brain could see the co-hincidence. For example, Peter Navarro saw the connection, and rightly so, the whole thing reeks to high heaven. And the 'conspiracy theories' AKA 'debates' started up: Was it natural? Was it man-made? But all that time the real controversy was that viruses could be man-made at all.
But you see: In my opinion it is both, maybe even intentionally so. It was natural in that IRL, illnesses spread 'naturally'. But the bug was man-made. Akshully, (and IMO) most of the respiratory bugs circulating these days, are man-made. For example: 'member the Swine Flu? How about: the SARS- and MERS-viruses? IMO, also of that ilk.
I believe we can trace the advent of 'mapping virus-DNA' using programmes to crunch data to the ealry nineties. In that sense, Billy is right: Viruses IRL are like computer programs. And there is plenty of room for fraud.
TBH though, (((they))) have been messing with 'essences of illness' or 'humours' since forever. Plague-doctors used to rub Bubo-pus on doorknobs, in the hope of prolonging the fortunate time of their special employments.
There is nuance also in the Killer-bug scenario.
So
IMO White Hats in South Africa released the Omicron (Mild and spready) to put an end to the nonsense. (Or maybe it was just natural evolution? on the part of the rapidly mutating virus?).
INB4: Viruses ain't real.
Dr. David Martin brings the sauce. https://www.bitchute.com/video/IM8L3SoxTHGP
I donât give this guy much of a listen since he claims to have recreated Christâs miracles using alchemy.
Judy Mikovits recently stated it was enhanced 1917 flu snippets and so always the flu. She also seems to have a deep loathing of Mr. Redfield. Hmmmm?