It's tied in with Q asking us to spread the message but without attributing to the source.
E.g., after Epstein, NXIVM, Nygaard, and now Diddy, it's pretty obvious to anyone that there are a lot of pedos and miscellaneous sexually-messed up people amongst the elites. It's easy enough to spread that message without resorting to quoting chapter and verse from Q to people who are hostile to the concept.
Not only that, but Q was relevant at the time. Of course a lot of the information we were lead to is timeless but so many of the Q posts were not meant to have people looking for relevance 6 years later.
Q was a special operation to jump-start our work.
It was never meant to be a "cult of Q".
It's tied in with Q asking us to spread the message but without attributing to the source.
E.g., after Epstein, NXIVM, Nygaard, and now Diddy, it's pretty obvious to anyone that there are a lot of pedos and miscellaneous sexually-messed up people amongst the elites. It's easy enough to spread that message without resorting to quoting chapter and verse from Q to people who are hostile to the concept.
Exactly!
Not only that, but Q was relevant at the time. Of course a lot of the information we were lead to is timeless but so many of the Q posts were not meant to have people looking for relevance 6 years later.
Agree 100% i never try to convince anyone of any Q related stuff.