We all know that the number one alternative candidate (other than Osama bin Laden) for the 9/11 attack was the state of Israel. This is why Israel is the "keystone" of both Qanon and freemasonry (Joe Lange has good writing on Israel as the keystone).
A few weeks ago I learned that there are strong arguments that Jesus was born on September 11, 3 BC. The classic book is by Ernest Martin and was written in 1991, long before the terror attack.
So my natural question is:
Did Israel attack on September 11 in part because its leaders believed that Jesus was born on September 11?
And, since Jesus is associated with goodness and turning the other cheek, would this be a reason why many or most of the deaths on 9/11 were faked, as argued by Miles Mathis?
A related question is: if orthodox Christianity was created, in part, to hide important truths about Jesus, then would the Julian and/or Gregorian calendar (with all of its apparent shortcomings) be designed in part to hide Jesus' birthday on September 11?
https://patriots.win/p/199huhObtW/x/c/4ZGTbyrXNHr
The founding stone of the Pentagon was apparently placed on 9/11, in 1941.
COMMENT AT LINK PROVIDED:
I like to say, just to provoke people, that Jesus was born on 6 October of 4 BC, Julian. At 3 in the morning. It was the first day of Tabernacles, and he was tabernacling among us.
Satanists sacrifice on any old day and they are adept at making up excuses to sacrifice, whether or not they are true. Don't listen to that channel. They want to claim all the days for themselves, but this is why we learn that all the days are already ours and we just need to revive our claims. I don't have evidence that Julian-Gregorian 9/11 is statistically more suspicious than other days.
Good catch! Fascinating!