I have not seen any study that shows raw milk has any benefits over Pasteurised milk.
On the other hand there are studies showing that raw milk is safe if the herds are farmed correctly and the milk is processed by standard methods.
Herds should be looked after and certified, and then it should be free choice whether to drink the raw milk or not.
There is insufficient study to support the use of raw milk. There risk of infection in poorly produced milk is well known but milk from healthy herds may be safe.
Raw Milk Consumption
Risks and Benefits
John A Lucey 1
........Claims related to improved nutrition, prevention of lactose intolerance, or provision of “good” bacteria from the consumption of raw milk have no scientific basis and are myths. There are some epidemiological data that indicate that children growing up in a farming environment are associated with a decreased risk of allergy and asthma; a variety of environmental factors may be involved and there is no direct evidence that raw milk consumption is involved in any “protective” effect.
There is insufficient study to support the use of raw milk.
I disagree, the table within the article I linked to you referenced 6 different studies. The dozen or so various pediatricians and nutritionists who have other findings are wrong because John A Lucey says so? What gives him the final word on the subject?
I have not seen any study that shows raw milk has any benefits over Pasteurised milk. On the other hand there are studies showing that raw milk is safe if the herds are farmed correctly and the milk is processed by standard methods. Herds should be looked after and certified, and then it should be free choice whether to drink the raw milk or not.
Here you are, fren.
https://www.realmilk.com/pasteurization-vitamins-milk/
There is insufficient study to support the use of raw milk. There risk of infection in poorly produced milk is well known but milk from healthy herds may be safe.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4890836/
Raw Milk Consumption Risks and Benefits John A Lucey 1
........Claims related to improved nutrition, prevention of lactose intolerance, or provision of “good” bacteria from the consumption of raw milk have no scientific basis and are myths. There are some epidemiological data that indicate that children growing up in a farming environment are associated with a decreased risk of allergy and asthma; a variety of environmental factors may be involved and there is no direct evidence that raw milk consumption is involved in any “protective” effect.
Note that with adequate study recommendations may change. This is, however, something for the future.
I stand by my comment that if the milk is processed safely by any method it should be a personal choice.
I disagree, the table within the article I linked to you referenced 6 different studies. The dozen or so various pediatricians and nutritionists who have other findings are wrong because John A Lucey says so? What gives him the final word on the subject?