"he would then go off and claim irrefutably wether we believed or not that it all tied into Jesus being incarnated and residing in the city as well?"
Oh wow - I never saw that, but had enough strange exchanges with him that I'm not surprised.
He would share some vague info that asked more questions than helped - and when I displayed eagerness to engage with him and go as deep as he wanted to on that subject (I'm about an hour from Racine) - he would seemingly avoid the invite to go deeper together, give a run around vague answer and sometimes get hostile in tone.
It was strange.
I get that some of us (ok, most of us!) here are strange ducks - and that's fine - but something about the exchanges with him felt... disingenuous once pushed.
Whether he's actually disingenuous or not isn't what I'm questioning, so much as - if he were genuine, then why make it so difficult for those of us here who are willing and "on his team" here? That's why I stopped spending energy on him.
I'm still curious about Racine whenever it comes up though since.
I don't know anything about Racine other than the rumors. I think you are right that someone's failure to engage with people on his team who are eager to learn from the only expert in town on a subject is a red flag. Similar to hair trigger blocking on X from like minded individuals is a red flag. Not a disqualifier, but a red flag.
My intuitive hunch (and that's all it is) is that Racine may very well be a corrupt place with some skeletons in the closet, but not the hub and origin of the cabal and all Earth's evil. It doesn't seem likely Trump would be able to win Wisconsin twice if it were that powerful. Even symbolically, they would have had to prevent him from winning the state.
"he would then go off and claim irrefutably wether we believed or not that it all tied into Jesus being incarnated and residing in the city as well?"
Oh wow - I never saw that, but had enough strange exchanges with him that I'm not surprised.
He would share some vague info that asked more questions than helped - and when I displayed eagerness to engage with him and go as deep as he wanted to on that subject (I'm about an hour from Racine) - he would seemingly avoid the invite to go deeper together, give a run around vague answer and sometimes get hostile in tone.
It was strange.
I get that some of us (ok, most of us!) here are strange ducks - and that's fine - but something about the exchanges with him felt... disingenuous once pushed.
Whether he's actually disingenuous or not isn't what I'm questioning, so much as - if he were genuine, then why make it so difficult for those of us here who are willing and "on his team" here? That's why I stopped spending energy on him.
I'm still curious about Racine whenever it comes up though since.
I don't know anything about Racine other than the rumors. I think you are right that someone's failure to engage with people on his team who are eager to learn from the only expert in town on a subject is a red flag. Similar to hair trigger blocking on X from like minded individuals is a red flag. Not a disqualifier, but a red flag.
My intuitive hunch (and that's all it is) is that Racine may very well be a corrupt place with some skeletons in the closet, but not the hub and origin of the cabal and all Earth's evil. It doesn't seem likely Trump would be able to win Wisconsin twice if it were that powerful. Even symbolically, they would have had to prevent him from winning the state.