Why is understanding important here? Can one act acknowledging such a temporary station (comprehension) without "supporting (standing under") it?
As samurai: Mayamoto Mushashi said: to perceive the things for what they are.
This leads me to one simple yet difficult matter:
In strategy, you have effectively won when you forestall the enemy.
We have seen this practiced over these last 8 years, and we will see more of it.
Trump:
BRICS currency? Dumping USD? Fine, here is the tariff on your shit. Good luck with that.
And, we know from these past 80 years, military strength is always temporary and dependent on the moral factor of the people making up that military.
In terms of weaponry, yes, it is an awesome sight to behold.
But, when you look closely at the way things are going: why is Sirky in the Sumi region so powerful? Why is it, that Doug McGregor announced the demise of the Ukro army, yet, the resistance is, despite overpowering weaponry and manpower, stiff and resilient? Why is Russia swapping Generals?
There is more to this game than meets the eye. Certainly, the Russian army should not be underestimated. It's weaponry is awesome. But to demand that Trump "understands" that?
But I do appreciate the call to take into account, that a landwar, at the end of the logistical feasibility, especially in the face of the gargantuan resources Russia has in place, it foolish and should be stopped.
And that is a reality Trump perceives. What I notice is how Trump emphasizes the human factor, the costs in human lives, the destruction of infrastructure, the suffering of the civilian population. This is reason enough to end a war that is based on a lie and not a just one.
Why is understanding important here? Can one act acknowledging such a temporary station (comprehension) without "supporting (standing under") it?
As samurai: Mayamoto Mushashi said: to perceive the things for what they are.
This leads me to one simple yet difficult matter:
We have seen this practiced over these last 8 years, and we will see more of it.
Trump:
And, we know from these past 80 years, military strength is always temporary and dependent on the moral factor of the people making up that military.
In terms of weaponry, yes, it is an awesome sight to behold.
But, when you look closely at the way things are going: why is Sirky in the Sumi region so powerful? Why is it, that Doug McGregor announced the demise of the Ukro army, yet, the resistance is, despite overpowering weaponry and manpower, stiff and resilient? Why is Russia swapping Generals?
There is more to this game than meets the eye. Certainly, the Russian army should not be underestimated. It's weaponry is awesome. But to demand that Trump "understands" that?
But I do appreciate the call to take into account, that a landwar, at the end of the logistical feasibility, especially in the face of the gargantuan resources Russia has in place, it foolish and should be stopped.
And that is a reality Trump perceives. What I notice is how Trump emphasizes the human factor, the costs in human lives, the destruction of infrastructure, the suffering of the civilian population. This is reason enough to end a war that is based on a lie and not a just one.