Friends, I really do not want to disappoint you, but I have been seeing "Fraud Vitiates Everything" coming up everywhere lately so I decided to do a deep, deep dive into what it really means.

Unfortunately, it does NOT mean what we have all been led to believe it means. If I were to post all of my research on here it would take up a great deal of space - so I will try to shorten it as best I can and give you my source.

The wording came from a lawsuit in 1894 - a civil lawsuit and would NOT apply to anything that is going on now regarding the 2020 election. "While "fraud vitiates everything" is a compelling legal maxim, its application in United States v. Throckmorton was specific to the context of civil judgments and does not extend automatically or directly to the nullification of presidential elections or governmental actions stemming from them."

If an election were proven fraudulent, the mechanism for directly voiding judicial appointments isn't clear. The political and legal fallout would likely involve new appointments or impeachment proceedings, but these would be highly contentious and legally complex.

The scenario would likely lead to a constitutional crisis, with debates over legitimacy, powers, and the very structure of government actions. It would necessitate a broad consensus on how to proceed, potentially involving Congress, the courts, and possibly constitutional amendments or new laws to address such a situation.

• Laws and Executive Orders: Theoretically, if an election were found to be fraudulent, any actions taken by an administration stemming from that election could be questioned. However, once signed into law, executive orders and laws generally remain in effect unless they are explicitly repealed or overturned by subsequent legislation or judicial review. There's no automatic mechanism to nullify them based solely on the illegitimacy of the election. The process for reversing these would likely involve new legislation or court decisions.

• Pardons: Pardons are generally considered final and irrevocable acts. However, if the legitimacy of the president issuing the pardons were to be fundamentally questioned due to a fraudulent election, there could be legal challenges to those pardons, though this would be unprecedented. The validity of such challenges would depend on judicial interpretation and precedent, which currently lacks clarity on this issue.

I received this information by asking GROK questions regarding the fraudulent 2020 election and the phrase "Fraud vitiates everything" - and yes, I found myself very disappointed in the answers. But it does explain why nothing has been done about the 2020 election fraud - it can be proven; but to what end?

We MUST put our faith in GOD.