2
2024TruthSeeker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek. That worked out better than it should've the first, third and seventh time.

3
2024TruthSeeker 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was skeptical as soon as I heard that the movie starred Armie Hammer - a true Hollyweirdo. I agree with OP assessments. However, I also felt a pressure valve being released, when I watched it. I will admit a sense of satisfying justice during some of the scenes. No shame. The main character does indeed deliver "justice" for those he asked if they wanted to receive it. That was the whole point to the movie. Idk what the OP missed there. But it's cool. It was absolutely dusturbing to watch the innocent people in the other car (probably) harmed by the main characters game of "chicken". It highlighted how unhinged this person is. It wasn't all about justice for him. He was a messed up person aware that he was a broken/bad person and purposing his dysfunctions toward a good cause (in his mind). Typical vigilante movie plot, similar to Batman in that way and also that the vigilante is wealthy. But, yes; I did wonder at times if the purpose was to radicalize and demonize all sides of the subject. That said, I absolutely think it was wrong to censor the movie.

25
2024TruthSeeker 25 points ago +25 / -0

Ok. So he admits to 25 million illegal voters... what percentage of the Democrat Party vote are we talking about?

2
2024TruthSeeker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any counts on how many of the mail in ballots were/are for Pratt? If so, how many? I'm sure "a tell" to the fraud could be found by answering this question.

2
2024TruthSeeker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek. Freeze-frames from my childhood.

view more: Next ›