Interesting tidbit from the 1946 Nuremberg tribunals.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
The US is not a signatory of the Nuremberg Code, as far as I understand.
It sounds from just brief reading that the U.S. has adopted more of the code than most (all?) other countries.
So while I believe you're right, it would depend on what we've adopted I guess. It's 5:20 AM and I haven't gotten a lick of sleep yet so this is going to be a bit rough, otherwise I'd jump down the hole and actively check into the specifics.
Getting started too late on my browse-to-sleep habit ahh.
It was late for me as well. I can tell you that I've looked into it in the past relating to human experiments using force or coercion, and I found that the Nuremberg Code was not adopted by the US, but California did adopt it as law under the states health and safety laws. But, maybe this tax issue is different than the 'code.' Maybe laws set under the trials are separate from the code of ethics known as the Nuremberg Code