The next UHC CEO can face the same fate. Eventually you'll get to where people don't want to be CEO of UHC, or, a person will emerge who will find a way to change the company to benefit both its customers and its shareholders. That's the WHOLE POINT of vigilantism.
But, we did successfully (perhaps...) "vote harder" this time to remedy some evils by electing "MAGA". So it seems possible some "nonviolent legal" remedies for these evils may be possible...
The "whole point" of vigilantism is for a weak minded, emotion driven individual to feel self righteous about doing evil. Keep it real. The society that espouses it descends into anarchy, as everyone seeks to do "right" in their own eyes.
The next UHC CEO can face the same fate. Eventually you'll get to where people don't want to be CEO of UHC, or, a person will emerge who will find a way to change the company to benefit both its customers and its shareholders. That's the WHOLE POINT of vigilantism.
I suppose the elites can "fight back" with various measures too though
I am not totally against self-defense, and these kinds of schemes can be violent at times (wrongly denying necessary acceptable care claims).
Even among Catholic theologians there have been "spicy" arguments made for "illegal" actions:
Article 7 on starving people stealing food - https://www.newadvent.org/summa/3066.htm
On "Tyrannicide": https://infogalactic.com/info/Tyrannicide#Political_theory
But, we did successfully (perhaps...) "vote harder" this time to remedy some evils by electing "MAGA". So it seems possible some "nonviolent legal" remedies for these evils may be possible...
The "whole point" of vigilantism is for a weak minded, emotion driven individual to feel self righteous about doing evil. Keep it real. The society that espouses it descends into anarchy, as everyone seeks to do "right" in their own eyes.