These people (Sidney, Rudy, and a 3rd person) are all knowledgeable attorneys who know not to make these claims against major corporations without proof. I am thinking this is a set up to get more exposure on this matter (election 2000). We've heard the rumors about watermarked ballots, 'data packets' sent to servers overseas which have been intercepted or copied by people here and are in the hands of patriots (My Pillow Mike), and there are actual tapes of Ruby double submitting ballots in Atlanta during the vote tallying. There is also the trucker who was on tape (I actually saw it back in late 2000) talking about the ballots he was hauling and he was suspiciously told to just drop his trailer and move on. That's still out there somewhere. I wonder if there is going to be a number of supreme court hearings in which these things all come into play. I know that evidence had to be provided in the lower courts but what if evidence was provided but not admitted? Cannot a higher court re-evaluate that decision and admit evidence previously offered but excluded (and then maybe send decision back to the lower court? Idk how these things work.).