Any and all archeological findings are highly controlled globally...Laws in every nation prevents knuckle draggers outside the secret handshake network from investigating anything they find.
I didn't watch more than a couple minutes if this because it's not going to yield much... I consider it a red herring.
Instead, I focus more on the buildings that were found-ed in the 1800s, along with cock and bull stories how they erected the buildings in only a year or two - stone buildings... complete with full ornamentation - absolute perfection. Like a bunch of donkey cart people had the skills and ability to erect these structures given the population numbers they provide. It's bs. No power tools, heavy equipment, they didn't even have lights...They erected scaffolding to paint what was already here.
Then look at the absolute shit they have built since. It's all bullshit.
The Smithsonian, UNESCO etc are complicit in hiding our past. There was an advanced civilization here before us... and we took over their buildings. Ones that clued us in on the past were destroyed in fires (stone buildings don't burn...they demolished them) - there's plenty of evidence to support what I'm saying.
So ... footprints in the sand? A waste of time. Yes there were giants on the earth... but what happened in more recent history. I believe all this free masonry is the key and secret being gaurded by the proverbial controllers.
There's nothing new under the sun. It's all been done before and technology is slowly given back to us. It's some kind if twisted game... and all of the fringe topics are intertwined with each other - the Baal worship, architecture, giants, technology, why they defaced or cut heads off of statues etc.
We've been fed a raft of historical bullshit for way too long...
If you haven't already, just go look at the Columbian Exposition of 1893 in Chicago and after you pick your jaw off the floor ask yourself if it makes sense to erect "temporary" buildings over 2 years, display them for 6 months and then demolish them like it's nothing... because there was so much cash at that time, we could be cavalier with things like that....it doesn't add up.
I agree with the Columbian Exposition/Ancient Tartaria stuff. But this was interesting too - If you bothered to look, the footprints in question were of ordinary size. The Giant 'big foot' stuff was from the thirties, when they found mammoth and sloth prints, and given their indistinct nature, these were confused with human prints.
The point is: the peeps that were heavily covered by the media, were dating the footprints by carbon-dating a plant that lives under water, found at the bottom of the prints. Ground water has a way of aging the results, because the carbon that is absorbed by the plants comes from buried carbon, not atmospheric carbon. The anomaly is also seasonal - in summer the water table is lower, so the results will be older, so to speak. So, carbon-dating that particular plant, or any under-water plant is a very unstable dating technique.
Any and all archeological findings are highly controlled globally...Laws in every nation prevents knuckle draggers outside the secret handshake network from investigating anything they find.
I didn't watch more than a couple minutes if this because it's not going to yield much... I consider it a red herring.
Instead, I focus more on the buildings that were found-ed in the 1800s, along with cock and bull stories how they erected the buildings in only a year or two - stone buildings... complete with full ornamentation - absolute perfection. Like a bunch of donkey cart people had the skills and ability to erect these structures given the population numbers they provide. It's bs. No power tools, heavy equipment, they didn't even have lights...They erected scaffolding to paint what was already here.
Then look at the absolute shit they have built since. It's all bullshit.
The Smithsonian, UNESCO etc are complicit in hiding our past. There was an advanced civilization here before us... and we took over their buildings. Ones that clued us in on the past were destroyed in fires (stone buildings don't burn...they demolished them) - there's plenty of evidence to support what I'm saying.
So ... footprints in the sand? A waste of time. Yes there were giants on the earth... but what happened in more recent history. I believe all this free masonry is the key and secret being gaurded by the proverbial controllers.
There's nothing new under the sun. It's all been done before and technology is slowly given back to us. It's some kind if twisted game... and all of the fringe topics are intertwined with each other - the Baal worship, architecture, giants, technology, why they defaced or cut heads off of statues etc.
We've been fed a raft of historical bullshit for way too long...
If you haven't already, just go look at the Columbian Exposition of 1893 in Chicago and after you pick your jaw off the floor ask yourself if it makes sense to erect "temporary" buildings over 2 years, display them for 6 months and then demolish them like it's nothing... because there was so much cash at that time, we could be cavalier with things like that....it doesn't add up.
I agree with the Columbian Exposition/Ancient Tartaria stuff. But this was interesting too - If you bothered to look, the footprints in question were of ordinary size. The Giant 'big foot' stuff was from the thirties, when they found mammoth and sloth prints, and given their indistinct nature, these were confused with human prints.
The point is: the peeps that were heavily covered by the media, were dating the footprints by carbon-dating a plant that lives under water, found at the bottom of the prints. Ground water has a way of aging the results, because the carbon that is absorbed by the plants comes from buried carbon, not atmospheric carbon. The anomaly is also seasonal - in summer the water table is lower, so the results will be older, so to speak. So, carbon-dating that particular plant, or any under-water plant is a very unstable dating technique.