I'm wondering if the whole evidence set to make it seem like it was some disgruntled policy holder or relative of a policy holder is just cover for an actual, professional, hitman. Even an amateur wouldn't leave such blatant evidence, especially the gun and backpack. Why wouldn't he just bring them with him when he fled the city?
Why would a professional hitman bring a cell phone AKA personal tracking device to the scene of an assassination? Makes no sense. Even an amateur would know to leave your phone and identifying personal items at home for a few hours lol
He left it there intentionally to throw cops off the scent or down a different path, possibly a burner or a patsy's he set up.
I'm wondering if the whole evidence set to make it seem like it was some disgruntled policy holder or relative of a policy holder is just cover for an actual, professional, hitman. Even an amateur wouldn't leave such blatant evidence, especially the gun and backpack. Why wouldn't he just bring them with him when he fled the city?
Why would a professional hitman bring a cell phone AKA personal tracking device to the scene of an assassination? Makes no sense. Even an amateur would know to leave your phone and identifying personal items at home for a few hours lol
He left it there intentionally to throw cops off the scent or down a different path, possibly a burner or a patsy's he set up.