I got your point, it was not difficult to understand but apparently mine was for you. I studied law and my Con Law professor was one of the most respected in the country. I’m some guy on a forum with a considerably greater education than most people, I’m sure.
Your “it’s never been challenged” argument is specious. By all means respond again, repeat your argument and Are welcomed to the last word on this matter. I understand there is no way to disabuse anyone of a false notion so stubbornly held. Have you read Garland? I doubt it or you could not reasonably cling to your belief. Good luck to you and I hope your further your self-educatIon of Constitutional law and actually read any applicable case law yourself.
I got your point, it was not difficult to understand but apparently mine was for you. I studied law and my Con Law professor was one of the most respected in the country. I’m some guy on a forum with a considerably greater education than most people, I’m sure.
Your “it’s never been challenged” argument is specious. By all means respond again, repeat your argument and Are welcomed to the last word on this matter. I understand there is no way to disabuse anyone of a false notion so stubbornly held. Have you read Garland? I doubt it or you could not reasonably cling to your belief. Good luck to you and I hope your further your self-educatIon of Constitutional law and actually read any applicable case law yourself.