What did Q mean, regarding DRONES: “Tracking Only”?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
The statement "drones over U.S., tracking only" can be interpreted in several ways based on context and the information available:
Surveillance Operations: This could imply that drones are being used for surveillance purposes across the United States, but with the specific intent of tracking rather than engaging or attacking. This might be part of law enforcement, security, or military operations where drones monitor areas, movements, or specific individuals without any intent to intervene physically. Such activities would align with the capabilities of drones to track movements or vehicles from above, potentially for purposes like border security, traffic monitoring, or tracking criminal activities.
Public Safety or Infrastructure Monitoring: Drones might also be deployed for tracking purposes related to public safety or infrastructure monitoring, such as checking on critical infrastructure like power lines, dams, or rail networks for maintenance or security reasons without any aggressive action. This would involve drones patrolling areas to collect data for safety or maintenance rather than for surveillance of individuals.
Conspiracy or Speculative Interpretations: In some contexts, particularly on social media or in conspiracy theory circles, such statements might be interpreted more dramatically, suggesting secretive government activities or surveillance beyond what's officially acknowledged. Posts on X suggest a variety of speculative interpretations, from testing new technologies to preparing for expanded surveillance under new legislation or acts. However, these interpretations are often more speculative than based on concrete evidence.
Given the various contexts, "tracking only" likely refers to drones being used in a non-invasive, observational capacity, focusing on gathering data or ensuring compliance with aviation regulations rather than any form of direct engagement or attack. However, without specific details, the exact intent behind the statement can vary widely.
best take on it yet and I agree. we speak of this on kun and as q stated - tracking only. was this the part where 'we were told i.e. scare event' ? 🤔maybe, seems logical. if so, makes more sense that this scare/sky event is exactly what q was talking about. tracking deepstate operatives right now w/said drones would be one way of pushing their own tech right back on their asses sealing their own fate. -hopefully. either way imo your analysis / threadpost should've gotten way more hits than what it has. -many thanks 👍
Trump gave us some clues:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0olzluZ/
thank you much for the link. great work - damn good info. 🫡 cheers!🍻
Cheers fren!