Which is MOST important to you -- 'Justice', 'Revenge', or 'Getting Our Country Back'?

posted 8 days ago by ProudOfAmerica 8 days ago by ProudOfAmerica +22 / -0

If I could only pick one -- my choice is 'Getting Our Country Back'.

I am in full and complete agreement with those of you who say 'if we don't punish the wrongdoers, they'll just do it again' -- but if I could only pick one...

And for those of you who are as pissed off as I am that these people have been so hurtful, so intentionally evil -- how do you propose to 'make things equal'?

How do you 'even the scales' when certain people have been responsible for harming hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people? There is no punishment that can even the score.

Unless you leave it to eternity.

I've struggled with this - but I, for one, hope that Trump is laser-focused on giving us our country back.

Then, if he has time left over, I want him to recover all the money stolen and put all these people in jail (or worse).

We will likely only have one leader like Trump in our lifetime, and I believe (short of a direct intervention by God himself) that Trump is the only one that has the ability to change the culture for the better. I'm hoping for some good leaders after Trump, but they better have a cleaned-up culture, or they will be toast.

I will applaud each and every arrest (and more) - but I've already decided to leave the full punishment up to God. There's nothing that we could do to any of these people that would make up for them killing millions.

As we enter this period of re-birth, I believe we need to have an eternal mindset.

52 comments

52 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (52)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– ProudOfAmerica [S] 1 point 8 days ago +1 / -0

There are likely hundreds of thousands of cases that need prosecution. (Look at the sealed indictments, for example.)

Over the course of four years, that's about 70 convictions per day (even if you limited it to only 100,000 cases and a 7-day-a-week schedule).

Even running military tribunals, do you really think these cases can be tried fairly in a day or two? (Some 'yes', but most 'no'.) And every defendant should be able to hire a defense lawyer -- but the supply will run out quickly (that might be a good thing, but it still means we can't prosecute everyone in an infinitely short time).

There are actual logistics involved. We need to prioritize.

permalink parent save report block reply