Marxists took over Bitcoin and added anti-commerce vectors like REPLACE BY FEE, strangled the network throughout by limiting max amount of transactions per block to a total of ~1MB and added a extra layer of complexity with something called Lightning network on top that requires a third party to fund a "channel" for others to be able to send money through that channel.
The real Bitcoin that allows real p2p electronic cash is still alive and well in the form of Bitcoin Cash, but the network effect and censorship have already gone global.
The proof is in the pudding. It is not possible to use Bitcoin BTC as peer to peer electronic cash as Satoshi laid out the technology and the invention back in 2008 with the publication of the Whitepaper.
If what you say is true you ought to be able to say it coherently and peacefully without resorting to a swarm of links.
Many Bitcoin forks fail even if they have "Bitcoin" in the name. The extraordinary claim that Bitcoin is out of Satoshi's hands now but an upstart startup is actually truer to his vision requires extraordinary evidence, not invocation of Groucho's long-lost brother.
So I started to play with Grok now that it is publicly available for free and was able to have it create this timeline:
Here's a timeline in plain English of how Bitcoin (BTC) evolved away from functioning as peer-to-peer electronic cash and the events leading to the creation of Bitcoin Cash (BCH):
2009: Bitcoin is launched by Satoshi Nakamoto. It's envisioned as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, allowing direct transactions without intermediaries.
2010: Bitcoin's block size is informally limited to 1MB by Satoshi to prevent spam transactions. This wasn't meant to be a permanent cap but was adopted as such later.
2013: Discussions about Bitcoin's scalability begin. The 1MB block size limit starts to be seen as a bottleneck, causing delays and higher fees during peak usage.
2015: "Replace-by-Fee" (RBF) is introduced. This allows users to replace an unconfirmed transaction with another that has a higher fee to incentivize miners to process it faster. Some see this as moving away from the simplicity of peer-to-peer cash.
2016: Segregated Witness (SegWit) is proposed as a soft fork to increase the block capacity by moving signature data outside the base block. While it technically increases capacity, it's not the straightforward block size increase some were hoping for, and it's seen as a compromise.
July 2017: After heated debates and failed attempts to agree on scaling solutions, Bitcoin Cash (BCH) splits from Bitcoin. BCH increases the block size to 8MB (later to 32MB), aiming to restore Bitcoin's original purpose as an electronic cash system with lower fees and faster transactions.
Post-Split:
Bitcoin (BTC): Continues to evolve with a focus on security, decentralization, and as a store of value or "digital gold." The community largely accepts SegWit, and later, the Lightning Network is promoted as a layer-2 solution for scalability, moving away from the original vision of direct blockchain transactions for everyday use.
Bitcoin Cash (BCH): Maintains a focus on being peer-to-peer electronic cash with larger blocks, aiming for low fees and high transaction throughput. BCH introduces adjustable block size, allowing for future increases if needed, in contrast to Bitcoin's more conservative approach.
This timeline shows how Bitcoin's evolution led to a divergence in philosophy and technical approach, with BCH attempting to stay true to the original vision of peer-to-peer electronic cash while BTC has taken a path more focused on security and value storage.
TL;DR:
Marxists took over Bitcoin and added anti-commerce vectors like REPLACE BY FEE, strangled the network throughout by limiting max amount of transactions per block to a total of ~1MB and added a extra layer of complexity with something called Lightning network on top that requires a third party to fund a "channel" for others to be able to send money through that channel.
The real Bitcoin that allows real p2p electronic cash is still alive and well in the form of Bitcoin Cash, but the network effect and censorship have already gone global.
The proof is in the pudding. It is not possible to use Bitcoin BTC as peer to peer electronic cash as Satoshi laid out the technology and the invention back in 2008 with the publication of the Whitepaper.
If what you say is true you ought to be able to say it coherently and peacefully without resorting to a swarm of links.
Many Bitcoin forks fail even if they have "Bitcoin" in the name. The extraordinary claim that Bitcoin is out of Satoshi's hands now but an upstart startup is actually truer to his vision requires extraordinary evidence, not invocation of Groucho's long-lost brother.
So I started to play with Grok now that it is publicly available for free and was able to have it create this timeline:
Here's a timeline in plain English of how Bitcoin (BTC) evolved away from functioning as peer-to-peer electronic cash and the events leading to the creation of Bitcoin Cash (BCH):
Post-Split:
Bitcoin (BTC): Continues to evolve with a focus on security, decentralization, and as a store of value or "digital gold." The community largely accepts SegWit, and later, the Lightning Network is promoted as a layer-2 solution for scalability, moving away from the original vision of direct blockchain transactions for everyday use.
Bitcoin Cash (BCH): Maintains a focus on being peer-to-peer electronic cash with larger blocks, aiming for low fees and high transaction throughput. BCH introduces adjustable block size, allowing for future increases if needed, in contrast to Bitcoin's more conservative approach.
This timeline shows how Bitcoin's evolution led to a divergence in philosophy and technical approach, with BCH attempting to stay true to the original vision of peer-to-peer electronic cash while BTC has taken a path more focused on security and value storage.