The samson option is a start point to start digging. When is a nuke more effective? When its delivery system has already completed its mission.. no chaff, no decoys, nothing to shoot down or intercept, no radar early warning.
I mentioned gamma rays because thats what the thought on some videos on the drones being a 'nuclear safety' type detection web were using. It might be thats its easier to detect ionizing radiation than alpha or beta particles, and thats the sensor options that these drone sensor systems went with. Easier than thermal (radioactive decay makes for hot materials), maybe more accurate than looking for very short lived helium concentrations. Helium in the environment basically floats straight up and then is essentially lost to space, which is why He suppliers for industry get so twitchy when people use it for party tricks.. its just not easy to obtain lots of.
The Epstein blackmail thing (and the number of heads of state that were involved) could quite easily have been a 2-part payload. One, compromise a president or industry leader and then use that compromise to move payloads around. Two, at any later point if your pedo network dies or is compromised, you have your secondary blackmail option installed.
There is nothing to dig for. I don't know what you imagine is to be found. Their Jericho missiles have been around for a long time.
Alpha and beta particles ARE ionizing radiation, but they don't propagate far before they are neutralized by the surrounding medium. Alphas are stopped dead by our epidermis, for example. Betas will penetrate a few millimeters into the skin. Fissionables do not decay with gamma radiation. Since alphas convert to helium, it is possible the drones have helium sniffers, which are an existing kind of sensor (usually employed to find leaks in gas-containing systems). Shielded and insulated materials are probably no warmer to the touch than the nearest person.
Helium wafts upward, true, but that is how it is detectable, and It does not separate out from the atmospheric gases until above the turbopause at about 100 km altitude. (A steady seepage will be atmospherically mixed at the outset.) Since the isotope is continually producing alphas, it is also continuously producing helium, and the concentration will not be short-lived. If the suppliers were twitchy, they wouldn't sell it, for industry or anyone, or the price would be higher. Helium is generated spontaneously by alpha emission from radioactive elements in the Earth's crust. It will never have a higher concentration, but it will also never run out (so far as humankind is concerned).
Here is the cite regarding the drones and the sensors. You will find video clips etc as well, they arent too hard to find. According to the post the drones are 'HPGe nuclear detector drones', and do indeed attempt to sense gamma frequency EM radiation. As I mentioned earlier, its not the only measurable and detectable by-product of radioactive material, but perhaps its the easiest to pick up.
I've seen these posts before. And I'm not a skeptic about the existence of drones, by the way. They may be sniffing for helium which is a tip-off for the alphas given off by fissionables.
Looking for gammas is relevant only if you are looking for fission products, which are always assumed to be the packing around a "dirty bomb." But I regard a "dirty bomb" as always being more storybook than reality. The reality is a real bomb, and why bother cloaking it with something that just creates a handling problem and facilitates detection? If you're in for an inch, you are in for a mile.
I've concluded the only rational course is to sit back and wait. Hyperventilating gets us nowhere close to the truth, and we have no way to influence any activity that may be productive. So far, the drones are pesky but not a threat. They are not in violation of any FAA laws, though they may violate government airspace (which would make it a government problem). Talk of shooting them down, at this point, is simple hot-headedness, and potentially dangerous to third parties. Would we advocate that if they were manned? I hope not. It was probably unwise to relax the drone operating regulations to permit nighttime operation.
I am reminded of the setup in Verne's "20,000 Leagues Under the Seas," in which the Nautilus submarine is hunted by naval ships as a dangerous beast of the seas. Ned Land, the harpooner, at one point sees a meanacing ship and tries to flag its attention to show that it is manned. He is struck down by Captain Nemo, who forbids drawing their notice. Ned complains to Professor Arronax, "But can't they see there are men in this matter?" Arronax replies, "Yes, and perhaps it is because of that."
Okay. Sauce for the Geiger counter libel?
Fissionables do not emit gamma rays (look it up). They emit alpha particles, which turn into helium gas.
The missing nukes from Ukraine are being stored in that version of the Brooklyn Bridge which is available for sale.
The samson option is a start point to start digging. When is a nuke more effective? When its delivery system has already completed its mission.. no chaff, no decoys, nothing to shoot down or intercept, no radar early warning.
I mentioned gamma rays because thats what the thought on some videos on the drones being a 'nuclear safety' type detection web were using. It might be thats its easier to detect ionizing radiation than alpha or beta particles, and thats the sensor options that these drone sensor systems went with. Easier than thermal (radioactive decay makes for hot materials), maybe more accurate than looking for very short lived helium concentrations. Helium in the environment basically floats straight up and then is essentially lost to space, which is why He suppliers for industry get so twitchy when people use it for party tricks.. its just not easy to obtain lots of.
The Epstein blackmail thing (and the number of heads of state that were involved) could quite easily have been a 2-part payload. One, compromise a president or industry leader and then use that compromise to move payloads around. Two, at any later point if your pedo network dies or is compromised, you have your secondary blackmail option installed.
There is nothing to dig for. I don't know what you imagine is to be found. Their Jericho missiles have been around for a long time.
Alpha and beta particles ARE ionizing radiation, but they don't propagate far before they are neutralized by the surrounding medium. Alphas are stopped dead by our epidermis, for example. Betas will penetrate a few millimeters into the skin. Fissionables do not decay with gamma radiation. Since alphas convert to helium, it is possible the drones have helium sniffers, which are an existing kind of sensor (usually employed to find leaks in gas-containing systems). Shielded and insulated materials are probably no warmer to the touch than the nearest person.
Helium wafts upward, true, but that is how it is detectable, and It does not separate out from the atmospheric gases until above the turbopause at about 100 km altitude. (A steady seepage will be atmospherically mixed at the outset.) Since the isotope is continually producing alphas, it is also continuously producing helium, and the concentration will not be short-lived. If the suppliers were twitchy, they wouldn't sell it, for industry or anyone, or the price would be higher. Helium is generated spontaneously by alpha emission from radioactive elements in the Earth's crust. It will never have a higher concentration, but it will also never run out (so far as humankind is concerned).
Here is the cite regarding the drones and the sensors. You will find video clips etc as well, they arent too hard to find. According to the post the drones are 'HPGe nuclear detector drones', and do indeed attempt to sense gamma frequency EM radiation. As I mentioned earlier, its not the only measurable and detectable by-product of radioactive material, but perhaps its the easiest to pick up.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0tMxfSY/further-corroborative-on-drones-/c/
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/latest-theory-drone-sightings-could-be-nuclear-sniffers-amid-elevated-radiation-readings
I've seen these posts before. And I'm not a skeptic about the existence of drones, by the way. They may be sniffing for helium which is a tip-off for the alphas given off by fissionables.
Looking for gammas is relevant only if you are looking for fission products, which are always assumed to be the packing around a "dirty bomb." But I regard a "dirty bomb" as always being more storybook than reality. The reality is a real bomb, and why bother cloaking it with something that just creates a handling problem and facilitates detection? If you're in for an inch, you are in for a mile.
I've concluded the only rational course is to sit back and wait. Hyperventilating gets us nowhere close to the truth, and we have no way to influence any activity that may be productive. So far, the drones are pesky but not a threat. They are not in violation of any FAA laws, though they may violate government airspace (which would make it a government problem). Talk of shooting them down, at this point, is simple hot-headedness, and potentially dangerous to third parties. Would we advocate that if they were manned? I hope not. It was probably unwise to relax the drone operating regulations to permit nighttime operation.
I am reminded of the setup in Verne's "20,000 Leagues Under the Seas," in which the Nautilus submarine is hunted by naval ships as a dangerous beast of the seas. Ned Land, the harpooner, at one point sees a meanacing ship and tries to flag its attention to show that it is manned. He is struck down by Captain Nemo, who forbids drawing their notice. Ned complains to Professor Arronax, "But can't they see there are men in this matter?" Arronax replies, "Yes, and perhaps it is because of that."