Devil's Advocate here, while I share the concern he has, he is extrapolating a bit here. from the bit of context of the paper he gives, it sounds like this is more of an inhalable vaccination administered nasally rather than some sort of vaccine bomb dropped on a city.
There's no doubt in my mind that governments would do such a thing if they thought they could get away with it, but we're a little ways off from that scenario with this paper is my point.
an interesting idea, but even then you'd have to produce a metric fuckton of whatever you wanted to release into air, and as another commenter pointed out, taking away the part that makes most people avoid shots in the first place would be simpler, cheaper, and more effective.
They're going to force 'medications,' they make their poisons in the cheapest places and ways possible for profit maximization, plus they're going to get government contracts anyway. The only effectivity they're looking for is getting people on the chronic illness and death pathways, and getting mRNA into them to turn them into little spike protein factories that shed was the plan.
put it to you this way. if they were going to go with such a supervillian level plan, putting it in drinking water would be more effective and less costly. You'd waste a ton of resources producing enough mrna to infect people through the air, assuming you didn't smother them outright from over saturation.
If you put it in the water, however, all you have to do is make it acid and heat resistant, and most people will end up eating drinking contaminated food/water, bathing in it, and before you know it, everyone ont he municipal water is already shedding. you're gonna miss the rural folks, but even they have to come into town eventually for supplies.
Devil's Advocate here, while I share the concern he has, he is extrapolating a bit here. from the bit of context of the paper he gives, it sounds like this is more of an inhalable vaccination administered nasally rather than some sort of vaccine bomb dropped on a city.
There's no doubt in my mind that governments would do such a thing if they thought they could get away with it, but we're a little ways off from that scenario with this paper is my point.
Misters in malls and supermarkets
an interesting idea, but even then you'd have to produce a metric fuckton of whatever you wanted to release into air, and as another commenter pointed out, taking away the part that makes most people avoid shots in the first place would be simpler, cheaper, and more effective.
They're going to force 'medications,' they make their poisons in the cheapest places and ways possible for profit maximization, plus they're going to get government contracts anyway. The only effectivity they're looking for is getting people on the chronic illness and death pathways, and getting mRNA into them to turn them into little spike protein factories that shed was the plan.
put it to you this way. if they were going to go with such a supervillian level plan, putting it in drinking water would be more effective and less costly. You'd waste a ton of resources producing enough mrna to infect people through the air, assuming you didn't smother them outright from over saturation.
If you put it in the water, however, all you have to do is make it acid and heat resistant, and most people will end up eating drinking contaminated food/water, bathing in it, and before you know it, everyone ont he municipal water is already shedding. you're gonna miss the rural folks, but even they have to come into town eventually for supplies.