We tend to think, when seeing London being under 50% English, that it’s the City of London that did this, or the UN, or some group of people that sits astride both those groups and more.
One way to test how this situation came to be is by looking back at the construction of early mosques. Who would have stood to benefit economically? Did someone have business interests in the Islamic world where they would have stood to benefit in their businesses by selling out England? Strategically? Was someone needed for assistance in some sort of temporary defensive position? We’re there English converts to Islam who sought to establish its position?
Let’s look at the London Central Mosque https://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Central_Mosque
Many efforts were made from 1900-1931 by a Lord Headley, who had converted to Islam, much like former CIA director John Brennan supposedly did, at age 58, before going on to establish the British Muslim Society, in collaboration with the homosexual Baron George Lloyd.
Other prominent English converts include Sir Archibald “Abdullah” Hamilton (after denying the use of the Churches of Rome and England), Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall, William Abdullah Quilliam, Timothy “Abdul Hakim Murad” John Winter, Robert Reschid Stanley, and many others, including many among the nobility.
The earliest mosque in England seems to have been established at Woking, 30 miles southwest of London. Over 1000 Englishmen converted to Islam through this mission from 1913 to 1960.
2 Timothy 3
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. 6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, 7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8 Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.
Who would want to prevent a realization that there can certainly be white Muslims?
Oh, Muslims would. Especially white ones.
I love Jesus. But ALL RELIGIONS have become divisional by human desire to have power over others. If you look back , belief in the creator is in all religions and unity in that belief. That's why the founding fathers chose the rights of the people to be ordained by God. Intentionally being vague about which God as not to pick sides.
The word “holy” means “set apart”, which is inherently divisional.
The key is “how” that’s done. The Scribes of the Bible would not interact with gentiles. Makes it rather difficult to be a light and blessing to all nations, it seems. The Muslims tend to force conversion. Hindus believe cows are dieties.
Jesus declared that he who would be first must make himself least and be a servant.
The founders knew very clearly which god they referred to, and were not vague to allow invitations of “Allah” or “Kali” or “Ba’al” or “Molech”.
No formal religion may have their manifestation of faith fully correct, but many religions endorse moral frameworks that are completely incompatible with Biblical teachings.
We cannot condemn child sacrifice or genital mutilation of children and say that we must allow full freedom of religion. Some religions consider those things forms of worship. It isn’t possible to square that circle.
On top of that, the constitution wasn’t vague. It says very explicitly, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. So 1. No Anglican / Roman state-sponsored church 2. No shutting down or telling some church what they can’t do.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=A6R_-AvCUsQ
In spite of its many flaws, Islam is probably not wholly off the rails, having some redeeming aspects, but also neither “freedom of religion” nor “the Constitution” is compatible with it. A nation will either be Christian, Islamic, or transitioning.
Intentionally vague as not to allow future generations to use religion to divide us. Although I too believe the founders were referring to the God of Abraham they didn't declare this for very good reason. Baby murder is murder in all modern religion do I don't know where you were going with that. Humanity has used all religion as a wedge and that's why I personally don't subscribe to any organization, I love Jesus. You long winded SOB
I definitely can’t argue that I’m not long-winded.
And just like that , we can be friends. Nice working with you