Here are the 38 RINOs who voted against the pared-down 116 pg CR supported by our PDJT. Make them famous. - The Great Awakening

Here are the 38 RINOs who voted against the pared-down 116 pg CR supported by our PDJT. Make them famous.

posted 101 days ago by rednekhipychik 101 days ago by rednekhipychik +122 / -3

Aaron Bean Andy Biggs Josh Brecheen Tim Burchett Eric Burlison Kat Cammack Michael Cloud Andrew Clyde Eli Crane John Curtis Jeff Duncan Russ Fulcher Bob Good Paul Gosar Andy Harris Wesley Hunt Doug Lamborn Debbie Lesko Greg Lopez Morgan Luttrell Nancy Масе Thomas Massie Tom McCormick Cory Mills Alex Mooney Blake Moore Nathaniel Moran Ralph Norman Andy Ogles Scott Perry Bill Posey Matt Rosendale Chip Roy David Schweikert Keith Self Victoria Spartz Tom Tiffany Beth Van Duyne

45 comments

45 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (45)

sorted by:

▲ 21 ▼

– BooniesRedneck 21 points 101 days ago +22 / -1

Sure they can read a 116 page bill in an hour. Then you have to parse the wording and find out where the grift is going. I think they should hold out for single items bills. Let’s make it the standard.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– Q20191776 6 points 101 days ago +6 / -0

Am pretty sure the fifteen rounds of Speaker selection battle was (in part) to implement new house rules that included single topic bills.

Rules of the House

See section 2.

Requirement with Respect to Single Subject Bills. Subsection (c) provides that, effective February 1, 2023, a bill or joint resolution may not be introduced unless the sponsor submits a statement setting forth the single subject of the bill or joint resolution. This statement must be included with the statement required by clause 7(c) of rule XII (Constitutional Authority Statements). A statement for any bill or joint resolution introduced prior to the effective date shall, to the extent practicable, be submitted by the sponsor prior to committee or House consideration.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– rednekhipychik [S] 2 points 101 days ago +2 / -0

I agree.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q