Sounds like you are looking for future fulfillment of something that already happened.
The Pax Romana ("Roman Peace") refers to a period of relative peace and stability across the Roman Empire, lasting roughly from 27 BC to 180 AD, initiated under Emperor Augustus. During this time, Rome established control over vast territories and ensured stability through its military might and governance. This period facilitated economic prosperity, cultural exchange, and the spread of ideas, including Christianity.
The Antichrist is described in Scripture (e.g., Daniel 9:27; 1 Thessalonians 5:3) as a figure who will bring a deceptive peace to the world before breaking it and ushering in chaos and persecution.
Well Titus Flavius Caesar Vespasianus Augustus was the Roman emperor in 70 AD, who like all Caesars, demanded worship above all gods, decided to destroy Jerusalem and the temple.
Read your Bible more.... along with history.
Don't get your eschatology from "left behind" books and Darbyism. That shit is only 200 years old and not what Christians traditionally believed for about 1800 years.
Agreed on your final point, but the existence of anti-Christian figures in history does not at all mean that we have already gotten through the period of antichrist. People who read their Bibles, know history, and aren’t duped by e.g. the chiliastic heresy can see that plainly.
Sorry but If People here actually think Trump or anyone else can Bring a GENUNINE PEACE to the World and Middle East do not read the Bible Much
Theology guy here:
Sounds like you are looking for future fulfillment of something that already happened.
The Pax Romana ("Roman Peace") refers to a period of relative peace and stability across the Roman Empire, lasting roughly from 27 BC to 180 AD, initiated under Emperor Augustus. During this time, Rome established control over vast territories and ensured stability through its military might and governance. This period facilitated economic prosperity, cultural exchange, and the spread of ideas, including Christianity.
The Antichrist is described in Scripture (e.g., Daniel 9:27; 1 Thessalonians 5:3) as a figure who will bring a deceptive peace to the world before breaking it and ushering in chaos and persecution.
Well Titus Flavius Caesar Vespasianus Augustus was the Roman emperor in 70 AD, who like all Caesars, demanded worship above all gods, decided to destroy Jerusalem and the temple.
Read your Bible more.... along with history.
Don't get your eschatology from "left behind" books and Darbyism. That shit is only 200 years old and not what Christians traditionally believed for about 1800 years.
Agreed on your final point, but the existence of anti-Christian figures in history does not at all mean that we have already gotten through the period of antichrist. People who read their Bibles, know history, and aren’t duped by e.g. the chiliastic heresy can see that plainly.
Seeing future fulfillment of Daniel and the book of Revelation only became popular with the publication of the Schofield reference Bible.
But since you're so versed in history I'm sure you knew that.
I'm sure you also know that having differing eschatological viewpoints isn't in the category of heresy as well.
I’m an Orthodox Christian and posted from that perspective. In the Orthodox Church the belief in chiliasm is formally denounced as heresy.