Giving aid to, and abetting our enemies also includes promoting the DS narrative and attempting to normalize their propaganda lies. (Emphasis added is mine.)

This seems to be the issue here. Your use of "our" is NOT representing the US government. It is representing the political opinions of Anons as a group.

So you're misinterpreting the identity of "enemies" in the definition of treason.

Insurrection involves inciting, assisting, or engaging in an act of open resistance against the authority, laws, or operations of the government.

Basically, you're changing this to

Insurrection involves inciting, assisting, or engaging in an act of open resistance against the authority, laws, or operations of my/our personal political opinions.

YOU are NOT the government. YOUR enemies are NOT necessarily the enemies of the government. Indeed, most of your enemies ARE part of the government.

Simply because Trump has been re-elected does not mean our entire government is now aligned with his political opinions.

So, yeah, it seems pretty obvious now that the issue here is people thinking that they are the personification of the US government, and anything that counters their opinions is treason. 🤷‍♀️

I'm actually pretty impressed that you all have done such a great job in helping me understand why I was suddenly seeing the "treason" card being tossed down so frequently.

So, sincerely, thanks for that.

I also wanted to thank you for your contribution in helping me understand why there's been such an increase of people here crying "treason" over practically everything.

At first, my thoughts were "Wait. What? How is that treason? What am I missing here? Maybe I'm not seeing something they are. I need to look deeper to see what is going on here."

Then, after having a few conversations about it here, my thoughts were "Yeah...they don't even know the definitions of the words they're using. Looks like they're just parroting others".

Then, after noticing similar arguments during these conversations, my thoughts evolved into "They think treason involves anything illegal or shady involved with politics or government".

Now, it seems obvious that there's a significant presence of people that identify treason as anything that counters their personal political opinions.

But maybe I'm wrong. If you'd like to actually explain the logic behind calling all of this treason, I'd be absolutely thrilled to see it.

Because as it is, the only contribution given here has been "it's treason because we say it's treason" and " it doesn't agree with my personal political opinion, so it must be treason".

So instead of just presenting more of the same, or just dipping out of the conversation altogether, perhaps you can actually give some sort of explanation of how any of this is treason.

I'll be happy to wait as long as needed for you to present such an explanation. Thanks in advance. ✌️

That's a hell of a lot of words you're using to say nothing.

Your post boils down to "It's treason because we say it's treason".

You're not doing much here to counter my theory that people equate treason as anything that counters their personal political opinions.

And typical attitude that if someone disagrees with you on anything, they obviously must be your enemy and are opposed to everything you stand for. The typical simplistic "all or nothing" stance.

Nice job. Well done on representing that stereotype. 👏👏👏