But those studies are at exposure levels exeeding what you'd get staring into a microwave oven while directly in front of it for most of your life.
E.g. Water is poisonous to you, but not at levels you will encounter in any sane scenario.
How do "digital signals" differ from "those found in nature"? I ask in earnest because a microwave oven is an analog source of 2.4 ghz radiation running at 750-1500 watts and is quite damaging and a wifi router is a digital source operating at a threshold of about a quarter of a watt. How would the wifi router's digital nature make up 749 watts of energy to be on par with it's destructive capacity?
But those studies are at exposure levels exeeding what you'd get staring into a microwave oven while directly in front of it for most of your life.
E.g. Water is poisonous to you, but not at levels you will encounter in any sane scenario.
How do "digital signals" differ from "those found in nature"? I ask in earnest because a microwave oven is an analog source of 2.4 ghz radiation running at 750-1500 watts and is quite damaging and a wifi router is a digital source operating at a threshold of about a quarter of a watt. How would the wifi router's digital nature make up 749 watts of energy to be on par with it's destructive capacity?