Regardless of any Globalist agendas. Realistically the eventual outcome of the Classic Liberal Republican/Democratic experiment combined with free market capitalism will eventually be some form of Global Government. Whether it be a Nation State or a Libertarian/Anarcho-Capitalist ‘Free Market’ Corporatocracy.
Cultural Diffusion by virtue of free transit of products and ideas. Economic migration of both the legal and illegal variety. And intermarriage across cultural, ethnic, and religious lines will start blurring cultural lines and National Identities.
For example. The main difference between a Globalist NAU, and one that’s formed naturally. Is precisely the fact it’s formed naturally. Whether out of economic interest, political deals or cultural affinity.
Versus unelected bureaucrats ramming it through without the opportunity for people in either nation to object.
The acquisitions of Greenland is a bit unique in that it’s still a part of Denmark though with heavy autonomy. And is sparsely populated to the point where it’s feasible to buy/Bribe the population who’d resist annexation. To either be in favor or able them to move to Denmark.
Thank you for an excellent reply - you are much smarter in this than I am. I just had a jingle in my brain about a concept of the one world government bringing our governance into four distinct regional/global political organizations. See my newest text for my query about it to Grok. I am not smart enough to really understand, but do appreciate those who can discuss it..
Regardless of any Globalist agendas. Realistically the eventual outcome of the Classic Liberal Republican/Democratic experiment combined with free market capitalism will eventually be some form of Global Government. Whether it be a Nation State or a Libertarian/Anarcho-Capitalist ‘Free Market’ Corporatocracy.
Cultural Diffusion by virtue of free transit of products and ideas. Economic migration of both the legal and illegal variety. And intermarriage across cultural, ethnic, and religious lines will start blurring cultural lines and National Identities.
For example. The main difference between a Globalist NAU, and one that’s formed naturally. Is precisely the fact it’s formed naturally. Whether out of economic interest, political deals or cultural affinity.
Versus unelected bureaucrats ramming it through without the opportunity for people in either nation to object.
The acquisitions of Greenland is a bit unique in that it’s still a part of Denmark though with heavy autonomy. And is sparsely populated to the point where it’s feasible to buy/Bribe the population who’d resist annexation. To either be in favor or able them to move to Denmark.
Thank you for an excellent reply - you are much smarter in this than I am. I just had a jingle in my brain about a concept of the one world government bringing our governance into four distinct regional/global political organizations. See my newest text for my query about it to Grok. I am not smart enough to really understand, but do appreciate those who can discuss it..