Thank God only the shooter was killed before he was able to kill any of his intended targets.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1757079921414091105
It is always an encouragement to hear of those upholding the authority of scripture and standing against those things that run contrary to.
Don’t host any more LGBT galas, even if they happen to be of the GOP and reaffirm your commitment to upholding and supporting the free exercise of the Christian faith in all aspects of life and in every sector of our culture, and you may regain any evangelical support you lost.
[Loyalty and trust is a two-way street by the way]
I’ve read some history pertaining to Alexander the Great and I have not yet found anything from antiquity suggesting that he was exclusively gay; he may have been a bi-sexual. He was recorded as having been a married man with at least one son albeit it is a known fact that the pre-Christian Greeks were not a culturally moral people and homosexuality was a known practice among them but that doesn’t mean we must affirm or glorify such practices.
https://finishtherace.com/ella-ford/backlash-after-netflix-turns-alexander-the-great-gay/
Trudeau had no regard for the safety of children and women in his crusade for LGBT causes placing him at odds with those still possessing some common sense and moral decency in Canada. Let’s hope and pray that the next Prime minister of Canada will be different and better.
https://tnc.news/2024/02/07/poilievre-against-irreversible-puberty-blockers-minors/
All of these links are about 1 year old. Why is this "news" now?
Alexander the Great, Was deity among mankind. His legend will echo through time forever. He was so powerful other emperors tried to place their names as his own. Think about it, to be so legendary you change your name to Alexander just to try to dress yourself in someone else's glory. THIS IS WHAT THE GAY AGENDA IS TRYING TO DO. ROLL AROUND IN HIS NAME LIKE A DOG COVERED IN SHIT. The term is to dirty his legendary status by covering ALEXANDER THE GREAT in gayification. It won't work, it did not work for copycat emperors it's not going to work for the gay community. Stop trying to make fetch, a thing.
Spot on u/Weneverleft
Ruin the reputation of anyone the people can look to as a righteous example.
I saw it for what it was back when I was a teenager… The bs slander that "Mary Magdalene was a whore" etc... these people are sick.
Q told us this was a problem.
It's refreshing when people see this "history slander" for what it is.
"Buy a history book published 20 years ago.
Buy a history book published 10 years ago.
Buy a history book published this year.
Compare.
Focus on WWI/WWII
Something ALARMING will be discovered."
u/#q1957
About Alexander, and bisexuality in general, that sexual orientation kind of seems to be that "red headed stepchild" of the whole LGBT etc (how many letters are there now?) letter salad crowd.
For some reason they seem to dislike people who like both and could choose to stick to normal heterosexual relationships if they want. If there are any of those characters in stories they usually are shown to find their "true love" only when they find a same sex lover.
And more often than not I have seen claims that when some historical figure, or even a fictional one, is portrayed or said to be bisexual there are instant claims that no, they were/are really gay! That if they ever had any heterosexual relationship it was just pretending, they really were gay! Gay gay gay! And if you try to argue that you will be attacked. Somebody seems to have been at least relatively happily married to a woman for most of their life, but there were rumors he had had some male lovers when younger, and it's "AHA!!! The marriage was a sham, he just married due to societal pressure, he was really gay!".
I wonder if that is because a bisexual can choose, and could even decide to not give in to his attraction to his own sex if he so chose. And they'd prefer that ability to choose not to exist, at all, for anybody. Unless it goes the other way, and who seemed like a heterosexual, or thought they were, was to realize they aren't, and then stick to that. But anybody who ever had a gay relationship, or attraction, should never go back to heterosexual ones, once anybody "turns" - or according to the activists, realizes their true nature - they then just have to stay that way.
Well, I suppose acknowledging that bisexuals exist there is the danger that even some of their most loved gay icons might even be, or have been those, and horror of horrors, might have been willing to choose differently if they met the right person, or were encouraged to do so. And they just don't like to think about that possibility.
I will say this in that Bi-sexuals definitely have no excuse. They DO have a choice and are not imprisoned by same-sex attractions and as for ex-LGBTs, (including those who had once been exclusively gay or lesbian), they are among the most suppressed and marginalized voices that there are because some of them DO go on to live happily in a heterosexual marriage or, out of moral and spiritual conviction, just simply abstain from LGBT behavior and activity altogether and it is their testimonies that are the most damaging to the LGBT agenda. But whether they were once bi-sexual, gay, lesbian, or transgender, they made the choice to break free of that lifestyle because they wanted to change. The LGBT community would like everyone to believe that sexual orientation or perceive sexual identity cannot be changed. Ex-LGBTs contend otherwise.