Agree. I got lectured a few weeks ago about how he loves statistics and he was always so good at statistics and how he just looks at their statistics to determine if he should believe the article. I remember reading last year or maybe the year before how basically anything can get peer reviewed and published even with falsified data (lying with statistics). But ultimately this person has a horrible track record of believing MSM. Then using articles to prove whatever MSM/pharma stated. He pretty much bought the whole COVID nonsense from day 1 and I kept saying it was engineered and released from day 1 and I was called a liar. Same with Ukraine/Russia, the biolabs, Hillary vs Trump, etc. but there is never a later acknowledgement that he was duped and I had it right, he usually does change his position eventually but it usually takes years and big reveals in the media.