I didn't say I trusted it. I said the sources were provided which we can look at.
One was Brookings Institute, so that's likely to favour commies.
Dear Mr Fitton just gave his opinion with no sources and my first thought was that he might be factually wrong, which I why I looked for a second opinion.
The Supreme Court seems to support Presidential pardons in most cases. I was hoping there might be some cases where they made an objection.
I mean, don't get too reeeeeeeed about a sourced LLM. It's just a web search and they're not to be trusted, either. Use discernment.
It would be great to know that blanket pardons for no named crime are unconstitutional but that wasn't the result returned.
perplexity ai's sources disagree with Tom :(
Can a US president issue a blanket pardon without mentioning a crime?
( Link is not permanent -- if it's gone, just ask it again yourself )
Are we going to trust AI more than people now? Keep in mind AI must be programmed and trained by people who may or may not have their own agendas.
I didn't say I trusted it. I said the sources were provided which we can look at. One was Brookings Institute, so that's likely to favour commies.
Dear Mr Fitton just gave his opinion with no sources and my first thought was that he might be factually wrong, which I why I looked for a second opinion.
The Supreme Court seems to support Presidential pardons in most cases. I was hoping there might be some cases where they made an objection.
I mean, don't get too reeeeeeeed about a sourced LLM. It's just a web search and they're not to be trusted, either. Use discernment.
It would be great to know that blanket pardons for no named crime are unconstitutional but that wasn't the result returned.