Until we we officially hear otherwise, Barron is not running a news account. The fact that this account is using Barrons name in an attempt to gain instant clout/clicks makes them seem very scammish and untrustworthy tbh.
EDIT - THIS FAKE CLICKBAIT ACCOUNT ISNT EVEN GIVING ACCURATE INFO ABOUT THIS.
Grok says its "not accurate".
GROK TLDR: while victims had to sign away rights to civil litigation against the Epstein Estate (this could potentially include Maxwell as she was an employee) to receive compensation, this does not extend to their ability to testify against her in criminal proceedings.
Full Grok breakdown below (Grok provides sources spread over 15 websites. Too many to list here but easy to confirm yourself):
According to information available:
Victims of Jeffrey Epstein who received compensation from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program had to sign a release form to waive their rights to litigate against the Epstein Estate and related entities and individuals. This release included protections for anyone who had been employed by, worked in any capacity for, or provided any services to Jeffrey Epstein, which could potentially include Ghislaine Maxwell, as she was described as having worked for Epstein in some contexts.
However, the release does not explicitly prevent victims from testifying against Ghislaine Maxwell in criminal proceedings or sharing information with law enforcement agencies. The release is primarily about civil litigation rights, not criminal testimony.
The language in the release form was broad, covering anyone related to Epstein's enterprises, but the exact implications for Maxwell's case were debated. The release meant that victims could not sue Maxwell civilly if they accepted the compensation, but they were still able to participate in criminal investigations or testify in criminal court against her.
Therefore, while victims had to sign away rights to civil litigation against Maxwell to receive compensation, this does not extend to their ability to testify against her in criminal proceedings.
THIS TWITTER ACCOUNT IS NOT RUN BY BARRON TRUMP
Until we we officially hear otherwise, Barron is not running a news account. The fact that this account is using Barrons name in an attempt to gain instant clout/clicks makes them seem very scammish and untrustworthy tbh.
Seems Barron is starting a real estate company though: https://www.newsweek.com/barron-trump-new-business-real-estate-2014039
EDIT - THIS FAKE CLICKBAIT ACCOUNT ISNT EVEN GIVING ACCURATE INFO ABOUT THIS.
Grok says its "not accurate".
GROK TLDR: while victims had to sign away rights to civil litigation against the Epstein Estate (this could potentially include Maxwell as she was an employee) to receive compensation, this does not extend to their ability to testify against her in criminal proceedings.
Full Grok breakdown below (Grok provides sources spread over 15 websites. Too many to list here but easy to confirm yourself):
X’s checkmark policy is confusing
The comments are full of yahoos that unquestioningly think its him. Pure clickbait. Always check sources, especially if it doesnt smell right.
Dont be one of the yahoos.
Good dig Barron, i think this might be our first sticky of your work?It's another account.. not his.
Barron would know how to spell “receive.”
Oh wow, way to go, Barron Trump 👑
With the 🧾