About the only countries that could feasibly support an expeditionary force in that lineup is France. And possibly the U.K.
Germany logistically can’t without outside assistance
And the one time they collectively tried to conduct a bombing campaign without American logistics. They ran out of ordnance after about 24 hours of sustained operation
There won't be any military response, because neither side would benefit from such pointless war. and with nukes we'd all lose.
Economic warfare is a more likely outcome. EU and China controls the worlds shipping, with Mærsk being one of the largest shippers. If they all sanction the US, it'll be two weeks or so until the entire country is crippled from broken supply chains.
Remember the plandemic, were all they did was to impose some "green" policy forcing ships to go slower to save fuel and it almost crippled the US, just by a small slowdown in the supply chains.
I still can't tell if Trump is serious about Greenland or just positioning.
If France or the UK sent forces to stop the US, a NATO ally and #1 funder of NATO's defense, and Trump actually wanted Greenland, there are billions or perhaps trillions of ways that Trump could get what he wants without France or the UK doing anything at all about it, let alone send expeditionary forces to stop the US of all countries.
If China or Russia were making a move (much closer than I think people realize), then I could see France or the UK putting on a "show force" to act like they could do anything at all.
About the only countries that could feasibly support an expeditionary force in that lineup is France. And possibly the U.K.
Germany logistically can’t without outside assistance
And the one time they collectively tried to conduct a bombing campaign without American logistics. They ran out of ordnance after about 24 hours of sustained operation
There won't be any military response, because neither side would benefit from such pointless war. and with nukes we'd all lose.
Economic warfare is a more likely outcome. EU and China controls the worlds shipping, with Mærsk being one of the largest shippers. If they all sanction the US, it'll be two weeks or so until the entire country is crippled from broken supply chains.
Remember the plandemic, were all they did was to impose some "green" policy forcing ships to go slower to save fuel and it almost crippled the US, just by a small slowdown in the supply chains.
Germany are not allowed to mount any campaign outside their borders, its the same with Japan.
I don't think any of them could.
I still can't tell if Trump is serious about Greenland or just positioning.
If France or the UK sent forces to stop the US, a NATO ally and #1 funder of NATO's defense, and Trump actually wanted Greenland, there are billions or perhaps trillions of ways that Trump could get what he wants without France or the UK doing anything at all about it, let alone send expeditionary forces to stop the US of all countries.
If China or Russia were making a move (much closer than I think people realize), then I could see France or the UK putting on a "show force" to act like they could do anything at all.