Read it again. A Machine created by a Man. Do we want this advocating or controlling us ? NO, NO.
END OF STORY.
THEY ARE SELLING YOU A LIE.
THE ONLY THING THAT IS NOT A LIE IS WHEN YOU HAVE ELON MUSK OR MIKE ADAMS HONESTLY TELLING YOU THEY ARE TRANING THE MACHINE OR THE FAKE A.I. WITH HONEST HUMANS AND PATRIOTS. (GROK, ENOCH)
I will stop yelling now, because Google, stole your data, was written by DARPA , not your friend, to work against you.
Big Difference.
Each iteration of the A.I. is narrower than the one that proceeded it, while the hype is a large multiple of the previous. This current iteration consists of only one technology, neural networks (e.g., large language models), aka, pattern recognition.
The technology is not intelligent, it has no intuition or understanding. However, we are being conditioned to think it is infallible, that it knows more than us, and that it should be controlling us. Besides pulling in easy money, all the buzz around A.I. is to convince us that it is inevitable and can't be stopped.
But it will stop itself: neural networks are reaching the limits of what's possible. To "train" a network requires immense amounts of data, and energy. Each incremental gain in performance, say from ChatGPT 2.0 to 3.0, requires exponentially more data (You are just a data source. Think of this every time you fill out a survey!) to achieve less. The curve of ability is asymptotic.
I think it will go the same way as internet search engines and social media. AI will start out useful showing huge promise but when people start trusting the technology it will be infiltrated to produce narrative based answers.
Very insidious, and highly likely. Once again, we willingly accept the collar and leash in the name of convenience.