I'm tired of seeing headlines of "Mass Shooting". Currently it's defined as when either 3-4 people are shot dead. So i ask is that a Massive amount of death? If you tell me 10-15 people are killed... okay that's kinda massive. So i propose that we update the definition to make headlines call mass shooting when the event kills 15 or more people. If it's less. It's just a shooting
Comments (6)
sorted by:
I think the problem is that the lame stream media has been using “mass shooting” to describe your average Tuesday night on MLK Ave.
Actually those don’t qualify. A gang banger could shoot up his whole neighborhood and it won’t qualify. Only white people can be “mass shooter”* *except for trans white people
Lol, it sure seems to be the rule.
This 👆
Using your logic, if a terrorist blows up a building it is "just a bombing", but if a nuke is dropped on a city it is mass destruction.
How many people have to be killed to make it more than "just a killing/shooting/bombing"? I understand what your meaning is, but your wording needs a lot of work.
So what I'm trying to get at here is to take away the lefts ability to flood the headlines with the title of "America is full of Mass Shootings" yeah it's a sad day when people get shot and killed and my point is not to diminish the loss of any life. My arguement is to change the perception or rather take back the idea that America is a lot safer than the headlines portray. Except the sithole chicago, that place is dangerous as fuck (but it's a dem city so it's by design). Anyways the left will constantly use mass shooting as a device to try and take away Americans rights to bare arms. All I wanted to do is float the idea out there